Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

Indo-Pak - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#199, 9 June 1999
 
Infiltration in Kargil Pakistan's Objectives and Strategies
D Suba Chandran
Research Officer, IPCS
 

The major objective behind the current infiltration of the Pakistan backed militants seems to be in continuation with its larger goal of internationalising the Kashmir issue. Pakistan was always attempting to send militants into Kashmir . This is evident from the immediate reactions of Pakistan after the Indian efforts made to eject the militants from its soil. The Foreign Minister of Pakistan requested the United Nation’s Secretary General, Kofi Annan, to send a Special Representative. The purpose, according to Aziz is "By himself (the special representative) being here, he can be able to reduce the ongoing tension and this could also lead to an increase in the presence of United Nations military observers". Later, Pakistan ’s Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif also sent a letter to the UN Secretary General, in which he has stated that India 's rejection of third party involvement in the Kashmir dispute negated the global trend for mediated settlement of conflicts. Thus the plan of Pakistan seems to be the internationalisation of the Kashmir issue, by calling for either the UN intervention or a third party mediation.

 

 

The second part of this strategy is embedded within the first one – to provoke India to retaliate, so that the issue could get internationalised. The fact that the militants have been supplied with Stinger missiles suggests that Pakistan anticipated air attacks from the Indian side.

 

 

The third reason underlying Pakistan ’s strategy could be to revive the insurgency in Kashmir . In the recent past, the insurgency situation in Kashmir has coming well under control, through the ongoing army operations. Life in Kashmir was returning to normalcy and the fact that tourism in Jammu and Kashmir was picking up and cinema shootings had restarted proves this reality. Internationalisation of the Kashmir issue would have received little response, if the situation in Kashmir remained calm and under the control of India . Hence it was essential for Pakistan to create trouble inside Kashmir and gain the attention of the international community.

 

 

Fourthly, Pakistan ’s policy is to make Kashmir appear as the “nuclear flash point” of the sub continent. With both countries becoming nuclear powers and a section of analysts in the subcontinent and elsewhere strongly believing that any clash between the “immature” India and Pakistan would result in nuclear war, Pakistan expects that the pressure would be greater on India to immediately solve the Kashmir issue. Pakistan ’s Foreign Minister referred Kashmir as a “nuclear flashpoint” resolving which is essential for the peace and stability of the region. To a large extent, Pakistan has succeeded in bringing the Kashmir issue to international notice. However, it is unlikely that Pakistan would be able to succeed in gaining the support of any major country including the US and UK to find a solution to this issue either through the UN or through third party mediation. However, an increase in militancy and threat to normalcy, could create a fear in the minds of citizens living in the area and make them question the effectiveness of the Indian Army. The psychological effect of civilians vacating their areas of residence would affect the victims and the others living in the state.

 

 

At the strategic level, Pakistan ’s expectations are probably be to direct the focus of India and the Army to Kargil and to areas surrounding Kargil, it would be easier for the militants to infiltrate through other entry points. The second strategic objective would be to control NH-1A, the national highway from Srinagar to Leh. Even if the militants could control the highway for a short period, it would be sufficient to score a point or two. Pakistan is well aware that the militants cannot hold the highway for long, because of Indian army operations and the international pressure. Probably, Pakistan might have thought that by the time, India begin its counter efforts, it could open the diplomatic channel and take credit for seeking for peace in the subcontinent. The fact that Nawaz spoke about sending his Foreign Minister Aziz confirms this assumption. Thirdly, at a broader level, the ISI is sure to increase its activities elsewhere in India , through aiding various fundamental groups in India , especially in the South. The Police in TamilNadu have recovered explosive devices in many parts of Madras , which prove this point.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Article by same Author
Reading Pakistan: Reopening the NATO Supply Line

Reading Pakistan: How does Pakistan see the War on Terrorism?

Reading Pakistan: Stand-Off on NATO Supply Line

‘Balochistan’ as a Strategic Issue vs the ‘Baloch’ as a Political Problem

Indo-Pak Nuclear CBMs: The Road to Nowhere

Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents

A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages

Reading Pakistan: A New Taliban Shura

Af-Pak Diary: Exporting Sectarianism?

Reading Pakistan: What will follow the NATO Strikes?

Af-Pak Diary: Civil War and Instability as an Option in Afghanistan

Reading Pakistan: What if US-Pak Ties Break?

Reading Pakistan: Why is the Haqqani Network so Important?

Af-Pak Diary: From Ahmad Shah Massoud to Rabbani

Ten Years After: ‘Terror Franchisees’ as an Evolving Phenomenon

Ten Years After: Al Qaeda’s Game Plan

Af-Pak Diary: Will Mullah Omar Negotiate? What is Taliban's End Game?

Af-Pak Diary: Should India Adapt to the Game, or Attempt to Change It?

Reading Pakistan-IV: A War within Pakistan’s Security Establishment?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Pakistan Jihad’s Lebensraum?

After Osama - VI: What will be the al Qaeda’s Game Plan?

After Osama - V: End the War on Terror?

Maulana Showkat Shah: One More Dead; How Many More To Go?

Reading Pakistan-III: Is Military the Only Glue?

Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet