Home Contact Us  
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3327, 8 February 2011
 
WikiWrecks: The Kashmir Escalation Effect
Radhavinod Raju
Former Director General, NIA
email: radhavinodraju@gmail.com
 

‘Terror training camps, though not directly run by the Pakistan government, continue to operate along the India-Pakistan border creating potential for conflict with India and instability in the region, according to secret diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.’

‘Terrorist organisations, like al-Qaeda, have begun using these camps as recruitment centres. After additional training... recruitees are then poised to commit terrorist activities,’ a senior British Foreign Office official Laura Hickey is reported to have told American diplomats.

‘Expressing Britain’s concern over what is described as the “Kashmir escalation effect”, Ms. Hickey reiterates the British view that a resolution of the Kashmir dispute would take away one of the main planks of extremist groups.’

After spending billions in Afghanistan in the last nine years, and having lost over a thousand of its soldiers, the US is nowhere near the goal that it set for itself in Afghanistan, and is now looking at ways to end the conflict, and get an honourable exit from there. In this effort, there are voices in the US and the UK that ask India to go the extra distance to ‘help’ Pakistan to concentrate on their bad lands bordering Afghanistan, so that the US and NATO forces can effectively tackle the Taliban. 

Why does Delhi get upset over such remarks? Even if India agrees to settle the Kashmir issue with Pakistan, is there a guarantee that terrorists based in Pakistan will stop their anti-India actions? Consider the following narrative. It will be clear that organizations like the Lashkar-e-Taiba have different ideas about executing jihad in India. Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists caught by J&K police in Jammu’s Doda district in  late 1999 have disclosed during interrogation that for them Kashmir is only the first step to going further deep into India. Hafeez Saeed, the chief patron of the Lashkar, is on record that the process of dialogue between India and Pakistan has no bearing on the ongoing jihad against India, and that even after Kashmir got liberated, the jihad would continue in the other parts of India. The Lashkar-e-Taiba and the Jaish-e-Mohammad continued their terrorist attacks not only in Kashmir, but other parts of India, even after 9/11 and the subsequent war on terror. The attack on the J&K Assembly took place on the 1st of October, 2001. The attack on the Indian Parliament took place on the 13th of December, 2001. Several murderous attacks have taken place in Delhi and Mumbai in which hundreds of innocent Indians have been killed by these mad men, one of the worst being India’s 26/11. Bangalore, Varanasi, Ahmedabad, Pune and Jaipur have witnessed terrorist attacks. So these threats of the Lashkar-e-Taiba and its patron are not idle threats, they are real threats. Ajmal Kasab, the lone L-e-T terrorist arrested in the 26/11 case, has given details of the training he got in the L-e-T camps and the directions given by Hafiz Saeed. David Headley, the American of Pakistani origin, has given details of the training he received from L-e-T handlers and the ISI officers during his India visits to prepare the ground for the 26/11 attacks, to the FBI and NIA officers. The nearest Pakistan has come to admitting the Pak establishment’s connection with the 26/11 terrorists is to say that rogue elements of the ISI could be involved in the attacks. The L-e-T dreams of establishing a Caliphate from Spain to the Philippines that includes India. And the Pakistani establishment considers this group its strategic asset to check India.   

India has, nevertheless, walked the distance with Pakistan through the Track II medium to try and resolve the Kashmir issue. Pakistan’s foreign minister of the day Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri has admitted that the two countries were close to agreeing on a final solution to the intractable problem. It is Pakistan which is now going back on this understanding. India called off the Track II talks only after the Mumbai attacks by Lashkar-e-Taiba terrorists. For the first time, one of the terrorists was caught alive, and the world in general, and Pakistan in particular, had to acknowledge that these terrorists were launched from Pakistani soil to cause death and destruction in Mumbai.

India showed tremendous restraint in the aftermath of this attack. Had such attacks taken place in Israel or the United States, the response of their governments would have been swift and deadly. India has only asked that the perpetrators of this dastardly attack be brought to book. The manner in which Hafiz Saeed, the principal conspirator of the Mumbai terrorist attacks struts about in different cities of Pakistan, spewing venom against India, and the snails progress in the court against a few minor actors in the 26/11 attacks, indicates the patronage that these terrorists have in Pakistan.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has clearly indicated the extent to which India is prepared to go to solve the Kashmir issue with Pakistan. He has ruled out any re-drawing of the boundaries on communal lines, but has shown willingness to make borders between the two Kashmirs irrelevant. That appears to be the only way forward for India and Pakistan to resolve Kashmir. This appears to be the position reached by the Track II group as mentioned recently by the former Pakistan Foreign Minister, Khurshid Mahmud Kasuri during his India visit. Can the US and UK nudge Pakistan to take the final steps on the lines recommended by the Track II group, destroy the terrorist infrastructure in that country, and resolve this long pending problem with India?

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Shanta Maree Surendran,
"China, Gwadar and Sea Lanes of Communication: ‘Economic Offence’ or ‘Active Defence’?," 25 February 2013
Bibhu Prasad Routray,
"India’s Northeast: Islamist Militancy in Assam?," 13 February 2013
D Suba Chandran,
"J&K after Afzal Guru: Immediate Excuse and Inherent Problems," 13 February 2013
Tilak Jha,
"2012 BRICS Summit: What is China’s Significance?," 3 April 2012
Panchali Saikia,
"Bangladesh on the Tipaimukh Dam: A Print Media Analysis," 30 January 2012
D Suba Chandran,
"Af-Pak Diary: The Taliban Apologists, Opportunists and Opponents," 15 January 2012
Alankrita Sinha,
"Playboy Magazine and AQ Khan: Incredible Credibility?," 30 December 2011
Radha Vinod Raju,
"Ghulam Nabi Fai and the ISI," 18 December 2011
Chok Tsering,
"Kodari Road: Implications for Nepal, China and India," 30 November 2011
J Jeganaathan,
"Norway in Sri Lanka: A Tale of the Failed Peace Process," 30 November 2011

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Samjhauta Express Blast Vs Mumbai Terror Attacks

WikiWrecks: Did the US Double-Cross India?

An Attack on Sufism

Tantrums that Terrorists Throw: Ajmal Kasab vs. Murugan

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.