Muslims comprise 30.9 per cent of Assam's 26.6 million people.
Six of the State's 27 districts have a Muslim majority population and the
community is believed to control the electoral verdict in 60 of Assam's 126
Assembly constituencies. Considered against this backdrop, when an all-India
Muslim party like the Jamiat Ulema-E-Hind organizes a huge public rally in
capital Guwahati, attended by the Chief Minister, a top Opposition leader, and
even the State Governor, people, including political observers and analysts, are
bound to take the show seriously. Furthermore, when Jamiat President, Maulana
Asad Madani, threatened to pull down the Congress Government headed by Tarun
Gogoi during the rally on 3 April 2005, if it failed to fulfill its 18-point
charter of demands within six months, the media played up the story.
Muslims might well be the deciding factor in the elections in
nearly half the State's Assembly constituencies, but organizations like the
Jamiat, or for that matter any other Muslim group, do not have a mass base in
Assam, nor do they exercise much influence on the community, particularly the
indigenous Assamese-speaking Muslims. But, in an election year, neither the
ruling Congress, nor the Opposition Asom Gana Parishad (AGP) want to antagonize
the Jamiat, which explains the decision of Chief Minister Gogoi and veteran AGP
leader and former Chief Minister Prafulla Kumar Mahanta to attend the rally.
Governor Lt Gen (retd) Ajai Singh's presence, however, surprised
many.
The Jamiat's key demands include granting of land deeds or
'pattas' to Muslim settlers in the 'char' or riverine areas in Assam and
citizenship certificates to the minorities for 'social security' . It is not the
Jamiat's influence among Muslims in Assam, but the demands made at this crucial
pre-poll juncture that will charge the political atmosphere in the
State.
The Congress has always been the sufferer in the murky politics
of citizenship in Assam with groups like the All Assam Students' Union (AASU)
and opposition parties like the AGP and the BJP accusing it of nurturing the
illegal Bangladeshi migrants as a vote bank. The decision of the Congress to
press for retention of the Illegal Migrants (Determination by Tribunals) Act,
1983, is projected by these bodies as indicating the ruling party's 'appeasement
policy' towards the Muslim settlers.
The AASU, AGP and the BJP want the IMDT Act to be replaced by
the Foreigners Act, 1946, that governs matters relating to foreigners and
immigration elsewhere in the country. These groups argue that the IMDT Act
provides enough loopholes to make detection and expulsion of illegal Bangladeshi
migrants difficult.
The BJP has warned the Congress Government in Assam that
if it were to concede to the Jamiat's demands, "there will be a mini Bangladesh
in every district in the State." However, the Congress has got back at Madani
and the Jamiat, by describing the organization as a "blackmailer"; hence, it is
unlikely that the Gogoi Government would be unduly worried over their
threat.
Jamiat or no Jamiat, the fact remains that Muslims are a key
factor in Assam's electoral politics. Therefore, even the AGP, which had earlier
collaborated with the BJP in the State elections, held a 'religious minority
convention' in Guwahati in March 2005. The conclave had decided to form a
'religious minority cell' to work for the socio-economic upliftment of the
"comparatively backward religious minorities" in the State.
The Jamiat's move to come to the aid of Muslim settlers in
riverine areas has once again brought to the fore the issue of Muslim population
growth in Assam and infiltration from Bangladesh. In 1971, Muslims, for
instance, comprised 64.46 per cent of the population in Dhubri district. This
rose to 70.45 per cent in 1991 providing a total growth of 77.42 per cent
between 1971 and 1991. By 2001 the proportion of Muslims had risen further to
74.29 per cent of the population in Dhubri. By 2001, the Muslim population in
Barpeta rose from 56.07 per cent in 1991 to 59.3 per cent.
There is need, however, to make a clear distinction between the
indigenous Assamese-speaking Muslims and Bangladeshi migrants before analyzing
the demographic, security or political implications of such population growth.
The growth rate of Muslims in districts far from the Bangladesh border varied
between 30 and 50 per cent (1971-1991) while it was more than 60 per cent during
the same period in areas bordering Bangladesh. Therefore, when one talks of
Muslim vote bank and so on in Assam, one is actually talking about the role of
the settlers and not necessarily that of the indigenous Assamese-speaking
Muslims. This point is often missed.