Home Contact Us
Search :

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1438, 17 July 2004
The 91st Constitutional Amendment and the NE States
Bibhu Prasad Routray
Institute for Conflict Management

The 91st constitutional amendment, passed in 2003, that requires restricting the size of the ministry to 15 per cent of the total size of the State legislative assemblies, has created a political upheaval in some of the north-eastern States. Whereas Chief Ministers of Tripura and Mizoram had a relatively peaceful time in limiting the size of their ministries, other States have witnessed political bickering among the elected representatives over retaining ministerial berths.


The worst drama is currently taking place in the state of Arunachal Pradesh where a number of former ministers have switched parties to express their anger against being removed from the list of ministers. This was expected in a State where 40 members of legislative assembly (MLAs) belonging to the Congress party had joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) overnight in August 2003, thereby creating the first BJP government in the region. As a means to keep this mobile stock together, all of them were given ministerial posts. However, the mandatory ministry downsizing removed the basis of their unity. In addition, with the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government coming to power at the Centre and the impending State polls in October 2004, aligning with the BJP made little political sense. A political drama is being witnessed in the state over the imposition of the President’s Rule, with one group swearing by the Governor’s first report, which recommended the Assembly’s dissolution, and the other group seeking to revoke the Assembly’s dissolution citing the Governor’s second report, which says that the first report was made under duress.


In Assam, the Chief Minister had to remove 16 of his ministers to bring the size of the cabinet down to the required level. As the Chief Minister camped in Delhi to seek the Congress high command’s approval of his list of ministers, many of his colleagues accompanied him in a last ditch effort to avoid being dropped. The removal of several senior cabinet ministers from the final list, however, incited their supporters to call for general strikes and other disruptive agitations. At one point, the Chief Minister had to issue an order to put a halt to such demonstrations. However, at the same time, he made a commitment not only to absorb the removed ministers as heads of various State government undertakings or in the party set up, but also to effect ministerial reshuffling regularly to keep the entire flock happy. However, the move is yet to pacify the aggrieved MLAs.


On the other hand, the Meghalaya Chief Minister D D Lapang, heading the coalition Meghalaya Democratic Alliance (MDA) has managed to pacify his former ministerial colleagues by appointing all of them either as chiefs of various state government undertakings or as parliamentary secretaries. In the process, the State has 15 new parliamentary secretaries and 11 new chairmen of different undertakings. 


In Manipur, the downsizing led to a deep resentment in the two Naga-dominated districts of Chandel and Ukhrul, both of which have not been represented in the new-look Okram Ibobi Singh-led Secular Progressive Front (SPF) government. Here too the Meghalaya formula is being applied as both Aza and Korungthang, the former ministers form these districts have been appointed as chairpersons of the Khadi and Village Industries Board and the Manipur Tribal Development Corporation respectively. Equally rewarding appointments have been bestowed on all the former ministers, who, by virtue of their record have developed a ‘right of sorts’ to hold on to some official position.


In Nagaland, the Janata Dal-United (JD-U) has left the coalition Democratic Alliance of Nagaland (DAN) due to the removal of two of its MLAs: Kushka Sumi and Deo Nukhu from the cabinet. Even though the DAN government does not face a threat as a result of their withdrawal, it did have to face angry outbursts from its coalition partners. The BJP too has been displeased with the Chief Minister’s decision to remove its ministers and the change in portfolio of its MLA T M Lotha from the Home Department to the Agriculture Department.  


No doubt this is a temporary phenomenon, and once the dust settles down, squabbles over ministries would be a thing of the past. However, what would remain in public memory is the gluttonous struggle for a slice of power among their representatives. More importantly, it is apparent that such hankering for power has defeated the very purpose of the amendment, which sought to limit governmental expenditure. The appointment of chairmen and parliamentary secretaries with ministerial ranks will continue to drain the state exchequers. And for the state economies, which, in the absence of internal resource mobilisation are completely dependant on central grant, these developments could not have been worse.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Stability in 2015
Sri Lanka: Making a Case for Change
Connecting Sri Lanka: Train to Jaffna
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Burying the Past: A New Beginning for Pakistan and Afghanistan
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Bangladesh: Diplomatic Manoeuvres at the UNGA
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism’s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
IPCS Forecast: East Asia in 2015
China-North Korea: Reasons for Reconciliation
Abe-Jinping Summit Meet: A Thaw in China-Japan Relations?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?
The Future of SAARC is Now

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ‘Look East’ to ‘Act East’
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
India’s Northeast: Need for a New Anti-Terror Policy
India-China: Securitising Water
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015
India and Maritime Security: Do More
Indian Ocean and the IORA: Search and Rescue Operations

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
IPCS Forecast: Left-wing Extremism in 2015
Maoist Attack on the CRPF: Time for New Counter-strategies
Naxal Violence: Challenges to Jharkhand Polls

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
18th SAARC Summit: An Economic Agenda
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security
Obama’s New Strategy towards the Islamic State: Implications for India

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
IPCS Forecast: West Asia in 2015
Rise of the Islamic State: Implications for the Arab World
Islamic State: The Efficacy of Counter-strategies
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
The Af-Pak Entity: Seduction to Armageddon?
Maritime Combat Power in the Indo-Pacific
Of Lawrence, Sykes-Picot and al-Baghdadi
Voice from America
Amit Gupta
Obama’s Rapprochement with Cuba
China's Global Ambition: Need to Emulate Germany
Mid-Term Elections: So What If the US Swings Hard Right?

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala

The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

IPCS Forecast: Left-wing Extremism in 2015

Maoist Attack on the CRPF: Time for New Counter-strategies

Naxal Violence: Challenges to Jharkhand Polls

Naxalites and the Might of a Fragile Revolution

Six Thousand Plus Killed: The Naxal Ideology of Violence

Anti-Naxal Operations: Seeking Refuge in Symbolism

A 'New' Counter-Naxal Action Plan

Tackling Naxal Violence: An Agenda for the New Indian Government

Naxalism: The Insufficiency of a Force-Centric Approach

Naxal Violence: Old Challenges for the New Government

Combating Naxal Violence: Transient and Permanent Success

Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making

Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?

Myanmar's Transition: Challenges of Continuing and Emerging Conflicts

Naxal Violence: New Structures and Old Woes in Jharkhand

India: Al Qaeda's Call to Muslim Youth

Myanmar: Profiling the 969 Movement

India’s Northeast: Islamist Militancy in Assam?

Naxal Violence: Expanding into India’s Northeast?

Myanmar and India's Northeast: Border Cooperation, Better Connectivity and Economic Integration

Myanmar: Obama’s Visit and the US Pivot to Asia

Myanmar: Combating Child Trafficking

Conflict Alert: Impact of Communal Clashes on Myanmar's Reform Project

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2015
 January  February  March
 2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007
 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999
 1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1900, Tel: 91-11-4100-1901, Tel/Fax: 91-11-4100-1902

© Copyright 2015, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com