Home Contact Us  

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1438, 17 July 2004
The 91st Constitutional Amendment and the NE States
Bibhu Prasad Routray
Institute for Conflict Management

The 91st constitutional amendment, passed in 2003, that requires restricting the size of the ministry to 15 per cent of the total size of the State legislative assemblies, has created a political upheaval in some of the north-eastern States. Whereas Chief Ministers of Tripura and Mizoram had a relatively peaceful time in limiting the size of their ministries, other States have witnessed political bickering among the elected representatives over retaining ministerial berths.


The worst drama is currently taking place in the state of Arunachal Pradesh where a number of former ministers have switched parties to express their anger against being removed from the list of ministers. This was expected in a State where 40 members of legislative assembly (MLAs) belonging to the Congress party had joined the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) overnight in August 2003, thereby creating the first BJP government in the region. As a means to keep this mobile stock together, all of them were given ministerial posts. However, the mandatory ministry downsizing removed the basis of their unity. In addition, with the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government coming to power at the Centre and the impending State polls in October 2004, aligning with the BJP made little political sense. A political drama is being witnessed in the state over the imposition of the President’s Rule, with one group swearing by the Governor’s first report, which recommended the Assembly’s dissolution, and the other group seeking to revoke the Assembly’s dissolution citing the Governor’s second report, which says that the first report was made under duress.


In Assam, the Chief Minister had to remove 16 of his ministers to bring the size of the cabinet down to the required level. As the Chief Minister camped in Delhi to seek the Congress high command’s approval of his list of ministers, many of his colleagues accompanied him in a last ditch effort to avoid being dropped. The removal of several senior cabinet ministers from the final list, however, incited their supporters to call for general strikes and other disruptive agitations. At one point, the Chief Minister had to issue an order to put a halt to such demonstrations. However, at the same time, he made a commitment not only to absorb the removed ministers as heads of various State government undertakings or in the party set up, but also to effect ministerial reshuffling regularly to keep the entire flock happy. However, the move is yet to pacify the aggrieved MLAs.


On the other hand, the Meghalaya Chief Minister D D Lapang, heading the coalition Meghalaya Democratic Alliance (MDA) has managed to pacify his former ministerial colleagues by appointing all of them either as chiefs of various state government undertakings or as parliamentary secretaries. In the process, the State has 15 new parliamentary secretaries and 11 new chairmen of different undertakings. 


In Manipur, the downsizing led to a deep resentment in the two Naga-dominated districts of Chandel and Ukhrul, both of which have not been represented in the new-look Okram Ibobi Singh-led Secular Progressive Front (SPF) government. Here too the Meghalaya formula is being applied as both Aza and Korungthang, the former ministers form these districts have been appointed as chairpersons of the Khadi and Village Industries Board and the Manipur Tribal Development Corporation respectively. Equally rewarding appointments have been bestowed on all the former ministers, who, by virtue of their record have developed a ‘right of sorts’ to hold on to some official position.


In Nagaland, the Janata Dal-United (JD-U) has left the coalition Democratic Alliance of Nagaland (DAN) due to the removal of two of its MLAs: Kushka Sumi and Deo Nukhu from the cabinet. Even though the DAN government does not face a threat as a result of their withdrawal, it did have to face angry outbursts from its coalition partners. The BJP too has been displeased with the Chief Minister’s decision to remove its ministers and the change in portfolio of its MLA T M Lotha from the Home Department to the Agriculture Department.  


No doubt this is a temporary phenomenon, and once the dust settles down, squabbles over ministries would be a thing of the past. However, what would remain in public memory is the gluttonous struggle for a slice of power among their representatives. More importantly, it is apparent that such hankering for power has defeated the very purpose of the amendment, which sought to limit governmental expenditure. The appointment of chairmen and parliamentary secretaries with ministerial ranks will continue to drain the state exchequers. And for the state economies, which, in the absence of internal resource mobilisation are completely dependant on central grant, these developments could not have been worse.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Dealing with Left Wing Extremism: No Permanent Solution?

Rumour of Triumph

Goa: Staging Post of the Resourceful

Forecast 2017: LWE Still Holding On

A Bridge Over River Gurupriya

Annihilation of the Marginalised: The New Normal in Myanmar

Rise of the Vainglorious Policeman

End Game: Fractured and Scarred Tribal Communities

The Dream that the State Sells

Development and Maoists

Maoists Vs Former Maoists: A Peep into Jharkhand's Counter-LWE Policy

The Re-cleansing of Nallamala

Forecast 2016: Shrinking Space for Left-wing Extremism

Anti-Maoist Operations in Chhattisgarh: Successes and Claims of Successes

Myanmar: A Long Road After the Grand Triumph

Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes

Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala

The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

IPCS Forecast: Left-wing Extremism in 2015

Maoist Attack on the CRPF: Time for New Counter-strategies

Naxal Violence: Challenges to Jharkhand Polls

Naxalites and the Might of a Fragile Revolution

Six Thousand Plus Killed: The Naxal Ideology of Violence

Anti-Naxal Operations: Seeking Refuge in Symbolism

A 'New' Counter-Naxal Action Plan

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.