Home Contact Us  
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4335, 12 March 2014
 
TAPI Pipeline: Expected by 2017?
Roomana Hukil
Research Officer, IPCS
 

Recent talks by the Indian Minister of Petroleum and Natural Gas, Veerappa Moily, on the Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline project and China taking over the chief controllership of the pipeline project from the US has resulted in the resurgence of the discourse on the longstanding uncertainty regarding the realisation of the pipeline. The Minister, at the recent Petrotech 2014, stated that the project has been “fast-tracked” and “readied” by the four countries, and is expected to reach India by August 2017. There are two questions that garner attention from this: what are the contemporary developments vis-a-vis the project in Asia? How likely is the prospect of the pipeline of becoming a reality by 2017?

Fractures in the pipeline
Although there is a shared sense of uncertainty extending from Central Asia to South Asia over the prospects of the project, there is also a sense of optimism that the project will help bring greater stability to the region than has been sought. Given that the end of 2014 will coincide with the withdrawal of the US troops from Afghanistan, the security and stability of the nation is the most pressing issue in the sub-continent.

The TAPI gas pipeline project is expected to help stabilise Afghanistan and supplement the reconstruction process by creating more job opportunities whilst guaranteeing income from the transit charges. However, this will depend on the resolution of the grave insurgency problem in the country’s southern provinces – where a substantial portion of the pipeline bridges through. The existing political and security-based instability in the Afghanistan-Pakistan bilateral is another issue the project will have to endure.

Secondly there’s a question of the tenuous India-Pakistan relationship affecting the progress of the project. Assuredly, the project will test both India and Pakistan’s determination and capability to resolve outstanding issues and normalising trade procedures.

Signed in 2012, TAPI was the first trans-national pipeline India struck a gas sale purchase agreement (GSPA) over. The project is of great significance to both countries as has been the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT). The IWT is a significant marker in the New Delhi-Islamabad strategic relations. Even during times when the countries were at war with each other, the IWT was not breached by either side.  Therefore, the TAPI pipeline project will be another major test of cooperation between India and Pakistan.

Another important perspective to this issue is that Turkmenistan's primary objective is to promote the TAPI gas pipeline project to reduce their reliance on supplies and aid from Russia, and to boost its annual gas exports to 180 billion cubic metres by 2030.

Tapping the TAPI by 2017-18 or Not?
Although there have been talks that the TAPI project will see the light of day in 2017, how plausible is the prospect of the project meeting its deadlines? There have been disagreements between the stakeholders vis-à-vis the nature of the project execution with regard to a timeline monitoring system – pitched by Afghanistan but batted out by Pakistan. Recently, there have been fresh technicality-based disagreements between Afghanistan and Pakistan over branches of the pipeline not being connected to its main route. While Afghanistan wants the Pakistani territory section to be laid towards Peshawar (where a majority of Afghan refugees reside), Pakistan prefers that the branch be set in Lahore – given that the demand for natural gas is comparatively higher there. Thus, the feasibility study has nearly concluded, but the approval hasn’t been passed due to the disagreement.

In Turkmenistan, there have been concerns as to whether the supply of gas can be sustained in the longer run at all. More importantly, there is still no clarity on who the underwriter of the project will be. Earlier, the main sponsor of the project was the U.S. Agency for International Development. These unresolved issues impede the project from materialising in the near future.  Owing to Turkmenistan’s attitude of not declaring the statistics of the hydrocarbon reserves owned by the country, there is no international pipeline company willing to put the project into action. Turkmenistan has refused to grant foreign investors a stake in its oil and gas fields. While several financial corporations have expressed interest in funding the project, there is no pipeline company ready to undertake the construction. Thus, the four countries have sought for a globally reputed firm to execute the project.

India has taken concerted efforts in speeding the implementation process of the project. Today, the Indian economic outlook is significantly better than what it used to be in 2012-13. Additionally, other stakeholders too are pressing for an international consortium to operate the $7.6-billion gas pipeline. More so, the Asian Development Bank as the transaction advisor will provide a greater thrust for a consortium cluster to accelerate the process. Thus, the prospects of a consortium materialising do not seem far flung this year.

Furthermore, Canada has exhibited interest in providing fracking technology to India and with the mutual declaration signed between Turkmenistan and China on building a strategic partnership to support the project several factors deem a favourable environment for the TAPI pipeline project to commence by 2017-18.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
D Suba Chandran,
"Connecting Asia: South Asia as a Strategic Bridge," 13 February 2014
D Suba Chandran,
"TAPI Pipeline: Will 2013-14 be the Tipping Point?," 6 December 2013

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Pakistan: Why are Christians Being Persecuted?

Muslims in Sri Lanka: Four Reasons for their Marginalisation

Sri Lanka, Myanmar and the Buddhist Radical Groups: New Alignments?

China’s Cartographic Aggression

Modi’s Thimpu Visit: Deepening India-Bhutan Relations

Malaysia, Thailand, and the Trafficking of the Rohingyas

China-Vietnam: The Oil Rig Non-diplomacy

India-China: A Water War over the Brahmaputra?

India-Bangladesh Relations: Significance of the Teesta Water-Sharing Agreement

South Asia’s 2013: A Time for Elections

India & Bangladesh: A Breakthrough in Water Relations?

Indian News Media: Does it have an Impact on Policy-Making?

Contemporary Nepal: Elections, Constitution-Making and Internal Politics

Addressing the Heat Wave over Brahmaputra River

South Asia: Anti-Trafficking, Flesh Trade and Human Rights

Bhutan Elections 2013

Myanmar: Unveiling ‘The Face of Buddhist Terror’

Cauvery and the Monsoon Surge

India, China and the Brahmaputra River: Beyond the Flood Data Agreement

India, China and the Brahmaputra: Understanding the Hydro-politics

Brahmaputra River Valley Authority: India and China Redefining their 'Global Commons’

India, China & the Brahmaputra: Riparian Rivalry

Review: India, Pakistan - Propelling Indus Water ‘Terrorism’ (IWT)

India, China, and Bangladesh: The Contentious Politics of the Brahmaputra River

Teesta Water Accord: Expectations for Indo-Bangladesh Water Diplomacy

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.