Home Contact Us  

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3090, 12 April 2010
Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit: Case for Indo-US Partnership?
Swaran Singh
Professor,Diplomacy & Disarmament, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
email: drswaransingh@gmail.com

Much talked of Nuclear Security Summit (NSS) of President Obama opens today in Washington DC.  Heads of state and government from 44 of the 47 participating countries – along with UN Secretary General and Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency – will spend two days deliberating on how to secure nuclear materials from falling into the hands of terrorists.  Unlike his predecessors, Obama remains convinced that nuclear terrorism poses the most immediate threat and needs urgent initiatives.  This makes nuclear terrorism his top priority opening new vistas for strengthening Indo-US partnership.

In spite of his critics and other last minute hiccups, two landmark events of last week – the release of Nuclear Posture Review and the signing of US-Russia Nuclear Agreement in Prague – have significantly boosted credentials of President Obama’s vision of a nuclear weapons free world, which remains the guiding spirit behind this summit.  This has enhanced his moral authority in leading the world leaders at this summit.

The origins of this summit can be traced to Obama’s presidential campaign where he had promised to ‘lead global effort to secure all nuclear weapons and materials at vulnerable sites within four years’ and conferring of the Nobel Peace Prize evinces his perseverance. Nevertheless, this summit has developed major glitches.  The Prime Ministers of three key allies – Australia, Britain, and Israel – are not attending it.  Given China’s annoyance with Obama meeting Dalai Lama last February and US arms supplies to Taiwan, President Hu Jintao did not confirm his participation until last week.  Even Canadian Prime Minister’s participation was confirmed only on Saturday morning.  In case of Australia and Israel this is a last minute decision, suspected of being politically motivated.

Moreover, given the nature of its agenda, i.e. understanding and preventing nuclear terrorism, deteriorating situation of another US ally – Pakistan – is expected to come under scrutiny.  Ideally, the summit is not supposed to focus on any individual nations yet North Korea and Iran are expected to remain writ large in its deliberations.

Lot of hard work has already gone into developing a common understanding.  Preparatory meetings of Sherpa (point persons) at Vienna, Washington, Tokyo and Hague ended last Friday in Washington and have evolved certain common text for their leaders to sign.  India’s Foreign Secretary, Nirupama Rao, has been the Indian Sherpa in all these meetings.  This continued engagement by India has ensured that discussions do not drift towards India’s non-signing of nuclear nonproliferation treaty and comprehensive test ban treaty.  This remains especially critical as India’s policy stance on both of these treaties has been evolving in recent past but the change is not yet firmed up for any formal announcement or public scrutiny.

It suits India, therefore, to take a high moral ground commensurate with its clean record and India is going to propose the setting up of an International Safety Center in India. Prime Minister Singh had made his interest in the summit clear from the very beginning.  As the role of civilian nuclear power expands in ensuring energy security, he says, nuclear nonproliferation becomes part of addressing the “developmental challenges of our times.”  There is also need to reinforce public faith in the positive side of nuclear science. India has already been recognized as a ‘responsible nuclear power’ with ‘impeccable record of security, safety and non-proliferation’ and has an opportunity to revive its global leadership in disarmament diplomacy.

To this effect India has already increased its visibility at the summit.  Originally, Prime Minster Singh was scheduled to meet President Obama briefly at the margins of the two-day summit. But given India’s concerns about various issues – like denial of access to Lashkar-e-Taiba operative David Headley, rumors about Pakistan inching towards an India-like nuclear deal, hiccups on India’s role in Afghanistan and so on –  as also due to intervention by State Department, two sides held a mini Indo-US summit yesterday discussing bilateral, regional and global initiatives. Among these the two made a major progress in implementing their nuclear as they have concluded negotiations on Reprocessing Agreement.

Singh and Obama now share a certain chemistry.  In his Keynote address to the US-India Business Council meeting last month, US Deputy National Security Adviser, Michael Froman, had declared that US considers “Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s attendance as key to the success” of the summit.  In tomorrow’s first plenary session, Prime Minister Singh will be among the select few to make an intervention outlining India’s track record in dealing with nuclear security.

No one is expecting this summit to produce lasting solutions. But this two-day summit will surely leave an important footprint in building consensus from amongst such a diverse group of countries on the need to (a) tighten their national controls over the export of nuclear materials, (b) to increase coordination in surveillance efforts and (c) encourage intelligence sharing against risks of nuclear materials and components potentially diverting to any terrorist organization.  Given that India will not be present at the NPT Review Conference next month this presents a golden opportunity for India to engage in this inter-national discourse in issues of nuclear proliferation and nuclear security.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China-India: Courting Closer Confidence

BRICS Summit: A Paradigm Shift?

BASIC Needs a New Strategy

China-India: Return to Robust Relations?

Hu Jintao’s enduring Tibet connection

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February  March
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.