Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#2128, 13 October 2006

Japan: Does the new PM have new policies?

Rukmani Gupta
Research Officer, IPCS
e-mail: rukmani@ipcs.org



Shinzo Abe's election as the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party after Koizumi's retirement and his subsequent appointment as the Prime Minister of Japan have generated much debate on the future course of Japanese policy - both domestic and foreign.

Abe was elected on a platform calling for continuing Koizumi's reforms. On the economic front, he has committed himself to reducing the disparities between rural and urban Japan - an unintended consequence of Koizumi's policies. Abe wishes to tackle Japan's huge fiscal deficit but has emphasised steady economic growth, like Koizumi. He has not made a definitive statement on increasing taxation keeping in mind the by-elections to the Lower House in October and elections to the Upper House next summer.

The new PM is also determined to carry on Koizumi's controversial education reforms. Emphasis in the recent debate over the place of English in the Japanese education system cannot overshadow the fact that, embedded in this revision of education policy, questions arise about Japan's perspectives on history and its relations with neighbouring states. These are issues that Japan and its neighbours expect Abe to tackle, and his stance will determine the course of East Asian politics in the future.

For Abe's domestic constituency, the abduction issue is the most emotional. Though a breakthrough in negotiations over the abduction issue came during Koizumi's tenure, as also an apology from Kim Il Jong, Abe's position is less accommodating. Abe's position during Koizumi's visit to Pyongyang and his persisting with this issue won him wide public support. Abe's Chief Cabinet Secretary Yasuhisa Shiozaki is also State Minister in Charge of North Korean Abductions of Japanese Nationals. Having established a governmental task force to deal with this issue, Abe has pledged to pursue a dialogue and settlement with Pyongyang. The Abe government was quick to impose economic sanctions and initiate united UN action against North Korea when it threatened to test nuclear missiles in future.

The debate on Constitutional reforms, especially a review of Article 9, has been revived by Abe's move to set up a committee to interpret the constitutional provisions related to collective defence. Being the first Japanese Prime Minister born after WW II, Abe has stated his intention to revise a Constitution drafted when Japan was under occupation. Koizumi's sanction for participation of Japan's SDF in Iraq and support to Allied forces in Afghanistan, believed to be a blatant violation of Article 9, has set a precedent that strengthens the case for constitutional reform. Abe's task, however, remains difficult.

He can be expected to continue greater defence cooperation and technology transfers with the US, which characterised Koizumi's term. Besides, the appointment of a national security advisor will strengthen the Security Council of Japan. Abe's opening speech emphasised Japan's need to engage with Asia and improve ties with China and South Korea. The legacy of stalled dialogues with Japan's East Asian neighbours left by Koizumi is a constraint. While the visits to the PRC and ROK are commendable, much depends on Abe's stance on Yasukuni. Unlike Koizumi, Abe has maintained a studied silence on Yasukuni. When he met Hu Jintao in Beijing this weekend, he refused to comment on the Yasukuni issue. Abe has agreed to abide by the Murayama statement of 1995 accepting Japan's colonial domination, but has not accepted the legitimacy of the Tokyo tribunal.

This particular position on history is a reflection of Abe's larger worldview and will influence his policies. While Abe is conscious of the ill-will generated by Japanese aggression in the past, he is unwilling to unreservedly accept the decisions handed down by the victors to Japan when under occupation. For Japan to take its place in the community of nations it needs to normalise the state. Abe believes that an apologetic Japan carrying its past burdens forever cannot move ahead. Abe is determined to break the shackles that prevent Japan from normalising.

The retention of Taro Aso as Foreign Minister is a signal that Abe is determined not to be bullied while undertaking dialogues with Japan's neighbours. The vision of a "beautiful country", a "new Japan" in an "era of nation-building" with Japan being more active on the global stage requires confident and aggressive decision making. Abe was handpicked by Koizumi as his successor; hence a continuation of reform processes can be expected. But, Abe is different from Koizumi since he is not a media maverick and does not court controversy. However, the hawks who surround Abe and the storm of controversy that preceded his ascension may give Abe the cover necessary to pursue his policies quietly and successfully.

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Article by same Author
The ‘Cheonan’ Investigation: Results and Aftermath
Obama-Hu meeting at the NSS – A Comment
China and ASEAN: Reviewing Relations
Obama in China
China and Japan - Assessing the Rapprochement
The PM's Japan Visit
The SCO: Challenging US pre-eminence?
Bangladesh: Recent Developments
China and Indo-US Civilian Nuclear Deal: Another Perspective
India-China Relations: Transforming Rhetoric Into Reality?
Six-Party Talks - Destined to Deadlock?
India-China: A Strategic and Cooperative Partnership

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.