Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#3519, 13 December 2011

The Afghan Debate: Is India the Solution?

J Jeganaathan
Research Officer, IPCS
email: chamujegan@gmail.com
 

While the US-led International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) (loosely referred to as the ‘West’) is preparing to withdraw its troops engaged in combat missions in Afghanistan by 2014, security analysts across the world are preoccupied with one big question: what will happen to Afghanistan after 2014? Two opposing perspectives emerge from the ongoing debates. For those who look at the question through a cold war prism foresee a bleak political future for Afghanistan in which the country descends into a civil war and complete chaos. Others who see the future of Afghanistan through a liberal prism anticipate a ‘stable’ Afghanistan supported and sustained by the international community.

When a similar dualistic view is applied to examine India’s role in Afghanistan at present and in the future, a contrasting proposition emerges: Is India a part of the Afghan problem or solution? This is a cyclic thought process which has no relevance for the Afghan question at present due to systemic and structural changes at the global level. This article argues optimistically that the future of Afghanistan will neither be a paradise nor be a nightmare for Afghans, rather it will be as uncertain as for other countries in the region. Undeniably, India will emerge as a hope for the Afghans to re-build their society and nation.

The Taliban, al Qaeda and Pakistan – the strategic trio once used by the CIA against the Soviet Union together form an albatross around the US’s neck, making its mission in Afghanistan an impossible task. However, the killing of Osama bin Laden, considered the backbone of the Taliban movement in terms of financial and other logistical assistance, is a key strategic objective that the mission has achieved. So now, the last speck that irritates US interest as well as Afghan’s political stability is Pakistan. If the Pakistan problem is fully addressed, then Afghanistan’s stability issue is half-solved. 

The recent security developments in the region especially post-Osama put Pakistan in a strategically awkward position. It can no longer denote India’s overt role in Afghanistan for its covert support for Taliban in the Af-Pak region and use the Kashmir card in its Afghan strategy. Domestically, anti-American sentiment has been more pervasive than anti-Indian sentiment ever since the US authorised UAV strikes in the north western border region. Its geopolitical interests in Afghanistan seem to have been ruined in the aftermath of Osama’s death, which exposed the nexus between Pakistan’s army, ISI and terrorist networks operating against Western interests. US-Pakistan relations also seem to be on the edge. Now, the international community views Pakistan as a spoiler not only for Afghanistan’s stability but also the region’s stability. 

A stable Afghanistan requires sustained external support. Unlike the Cold War bipolar order, the current international system provides ample space for international and regional players to manoeuvre. The structure also favours an international presence in terms of geo-economic interests rather than geopolitical interests in Afghanistan, which eventually helps Afghanistan realize its economic potential. It appears that no external players would prefer a ‘divide and rule’ policy towards Afghanistan as there is an emerging consensus that prefers a ‘unite and govern’ policy for mutual politico-economic benefits.

The regional security organizations can also play a major role in this aspect. The West has earned a bad reputation in Afghanistan due to their military overtures in the last one decade. Pakistan and Iran cannot play a substantial stabilizing role for ethno-demographic reasons. Only China and India have the potential to become acknowledged players in Afghanistan. In fact, India already has strong connections due to its presence through various developmental projects.

Yet, even though India’s role in Afghanistan is historical it has also been controversial. At present its role is being seen by the Afghan people as well as the international community as genuinely committed to re-building Afghanistan through community and infrastructure development. The signing of the strategic partnership is nothing but a strategic signpost pointing in this direction. India had been blamed for its alleged role in abetting the militants in Balochistan against Pakistan. This is the standard reason for Pakistani apprehensions over India’s involvement in Afghanistan. However, in the post 9/11 scenario, India seems to have abandoned any kind of covert or subversive action under its foreign and security policy strategy because of its counter-productive results. The US representative for Af-Pak region recently denied such allegations from Pakistan against India as baseless and lacking credible evidence.

At the same time, the US has been very assertive towards Pakistan to dismantle and destroy terror networks such as the Haqqani Network. It seems that Pakistan will be less apprehensive about India’s growing role in Afghanistan’s post the war reconstruction process. In addition, the recent granting of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status to India by Pakistan is a goodwill gesture in this direction. India therefore appears to be the hope for the Afghans. But, the question of whether India can fulfil this hope remains to be seen in the future. For this, India needs to articulate its strategy towards Afghanistan very clearly within the ambit of the strategic partnership framework.

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Related Article
Indo-Vietnam Defence Relations: Strategically Responsive
A 'Delhi Discourse' with Central Asia: Reviving Linkages
Pakistan: The Imran Khan Phenomenon
India, Australia and Uranium: What after the ‘Labor’ Pains?
India's China Policy: Should it be ‘Effective’ or ‘Assertive’?

 
Article by same Author
LLRC Report on Sri Lanka’s War: Pride, Prejudice and Paradise
India’s Iran Dilemma: Nuclear Fuel or Crude Oil?
Norway in Sri Lanka: A Tale of the Failed Peace Process
Ballot Cry of Tamils in Sri Lanka: “Tamil Political Parties, Unite!”
Rule of Law or Law of the Ruler?: India’s Stand on Sri Lanka
Sri Lanka’s post-war Foreign Policy Strategy: Europeans out and Chinese in?

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet