Home Contact Us
Search :
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1158, 20 September 2003
 
Dam it! Why Big Dams in India’s Northeast Will Not Bring Prosperity
Gargi
Freelancer
 

On 30 August Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee assured that by 2007 every village in the country would be electrified and by 2012 every house illuminated. However, gloom descended over the eight northeastern states following this announcement. For this region it means a fresh wave of environmental devastation: the northeastern states would have to build some 45 big hydroelectricity projects and submerge vast areas of its still dense forests to produce about 60 per cent of the power required to implement this decision.

Even before the news could reach the northeast, the tribal communities who will be displaced by the new dams were on streets intensifying their opposition to hydroelectricity projects. Besides asking for fresh cost-benefit analyses of all projects, communities are demanding decommissioning of at least two major hydropower projects in Manipur and Tripura. Tribal communities have been opposing the existing and ongoing hydroelectricity projects in all the northeast states. At present, there are 55 projects at various stages of execution.

The Prime Minister’s promise is a part of his ambitious "Mission 2012, Power for All" initiative launched in May this year. Under this initiative 50,000 MW of hydroelectric power would be produced in 16 states. The northeastern region has been identified as a major contributor to this plan.  Of the 162 hydroelectric schemes planned, 42 major schemes are located in Arunachal Pradesh alone. According to Central Electricity Authority (CEA), the state on its own has the potential of producing 49,000 MW of hydroelectricity, just 1000 MW short of the Prime Minister’s target. Altogether, 68 projects will be located in the northeast under this programme.

However, environmentalist and local communities are contesting the very idea of having more dams. “The proposed projects would not benefit the North East region as far as power is concerned. Also despite the presence of many projects the region remains backward,” says Anaspasia Pinpo, director of Imphal-based Centre for Organisation Research and Education (CORE).. The region’s peak demand of power at the end of the Ninth Plan was 1809 MW. The planned addition to hydropower generation in NE is 19,098 MW by 2020, which is more than three times the projected peak demand of power in 2020 (5700 MW), according to a paper by DC Goswami and Partha J Das of Department of Environmental Sciences, Gauhati University.

The history of hydroelectricity projects and the trail of ecological devastation wrought by them are the major reasons why local communities have opposed the current initiative. “The social and environmental costs of past projects are much more than the benefits from them. These costs are going to be heavy and mostly paid by the poorest dependent on the natural resources around them,” says Pinpo. For example, the Gumti project in Tripura submerged over 4634 ha of land and displaced over three thousand families in the mid-1970s. The project has not generated more than 5 MW though its installed capacity is 15 MW annually.

As one of the world’s bio-diversity hotspots and most seismically active areas, the northeast has not had very pleasant experiences with big dams. Both in the Subansiri and Tipaimukh projects, comprehensive environmental assessments were not conducted.. Similarly, no projections have been made on the cumulative effect of so many projects concentrated in a relatively small area. On the other hand, project officials have not disclosed their own assessments reports to the local people terming these as classified documents. Most protest movements are centred on this issue of the lack of information.. “It is just impossible to know what the project would do to our lives,” says Ramanand Wangkheirakpam, an activist and research scholar in Jawaharlal University who has studied the impact of big projects on livelihood in Manipur.

Civil society and community groups in the northeastern states have come together to demand review of all the existing projects. These groups are demanding decommissioning of projects which have become environmental and economic burdens for the region. The 108 MW Loktak hydroelectricity project on a 25,000 years old natural lake host of the only floating national park in the world, is a primary target. The barrage built on it has reduced outflow of silt in the lake. This has caused heavy siltation and shrunk Loktak from 495 sq.. kms.. in 1971 to just 289 sq. kms.. in 1990.

The protests in the northeast revolve around local livelihood security. Forests and lands are the two crutches of economy in the northeast. The prime minister must take note of this dissent if he really wants the region to prosper economically. The local people have the right to decide what development model they wish to adopt.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Uranium Heist

A Difficult Waste

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com