Home Contact Us  
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4587, 31 July 2014
 
BRICS: China’s End-Game
Teshu Singh
Senior Research Officer, CRP, IPCS
Email: teshu@ipcs.org
 

The recently held BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) Summit (14-16 July 2014) is representative of developing countries and forty per cent of the world's population. It is also a successful non-Western international organisation that has representation from three continents.

Among the five participating countries, China, one of the co-founders of BRICS, is the most influential. The growing role of China in the BRICS therefore raises as important question: What is the Chinese endgame in the BRICS? What are its objectives?

Strategic Importance of the BRICS for China
Since the mid-1990s China has expanded its bilateral and multilateral partnerships to increase its comprehensive national power. It joined the ASEAN+3 in 1997, WTO (World Trade Organisation) in 2001, SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation) in 2001, and BRICS in 2008. Chinese foreign policy has become less personalised and more institutionalised, and more specifically, it is indicative of China’s growing interest in ‘multilateral diplomacy’ and ‘peripheral diplomacy’.

China’s interest in the BRICS is further accentuated by the fact that it forms one of the pillars of China‘s ‘multilateral diplomacy’ as highlighted in the CPC (Communist Party of China) working report during the 18th Party Congress in November 2012. The other pillars of multilateral diplomacy are the UN, G20 and the SCO. For this, there are several research institutes in China for ‘BRICS studies’.

All the members of the BRICS are not China’s neighbours, and China is therefore using this forum to take forward its ‘peripheral diplomacy’. At an exclusive conference held in Beijing on 24-25 October 2013 on ‘peripheral diplomacy’, Li Keqiang stated, “If there is anything like the BRICS bank plan, it is likely that China would offer to pay a larger share of the capital in exchange for greater control.” During the recent BRICS Summit, China announced the establishment of a bank for the smooth functioning of the ‘Maritime Silk Road’ (MSR). The MSR is a tool for China’s peripheral diplomacy. In addition to the smooth functioning of the MSR, China has announced the opening of the Asian Investment Infrastructure Bank dedicated to the MSR project. Thus, the developments of the BRICS indirectly cater to China’s ‘peripheral diplomacy’ also.

Towards Achieving the Chinese End-game
In its quest for great power status and zeal to contribute to the international system, the BRICS announced the establishment of the New Development Bank (NBD) with its headquarters in Shanghai and the Contingent Reserve Arrangements (CRA) during the 2014 Summit. The idea of the NDB was mooted during the 2012 BRICS meetings as an alternative to the Western financial system. With respect to the CRA, each of the BRICS countries is contributing ten billion USD and China is contributing forty billion USD. This will form the backbone of the bank. The location of the headquarters itself exemplifies the dominance of China. The entire process will increase China’s role and decrease dependence on the World Bank and IMF that are dominated by the West. This is a good opportunity for China to project itself as a responsible power in terms of its investment strategy in the developing countries.

Chinese leaders have deemed the next twenty years a strategic opportunity (zhanlue jiyuqi) to develop their country and China is using the BRICS as a strategic platform for its power projection. The diverse partners in the organisation have opened vistas of opportunity for China to make investments. Since China is making the maximum investments it is bound to reap larger dividends from the bank. This also exemplifies the fact that China wants to reform the international financial system in a way that will allow it to play a much larger role. Thus, the bank will bring economic and strategic benefits to China and the ratio in terms of funding has already put China in the great power club.

China is also using BRICS as a forum to disburse the ‘China threat' theory. The recent developments in the Asia Pacific have projected a very aggressive view of China and have raised questions about the ‘China rise’/its peaceful development. Resultantly, China is using BRICS to promote its foreign policy agenda of becoming a responsible global power. 

China believes that it is imperative to restructure its foreign policy if it seeks to play a larger international role. It has started popularising new concepts like the ‘model for big–small States’ to highlight its relations with developing countries like Nepal and Sri Lanka. To highlight its relations with the US, it has come up with the term ‘new type of relationship’. China is using the BRICS to emerge as the leader of the five countries that in turns feeds into its foreign policy agenda of becoming a responsible global power. 

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Geeta Kochhar,
"BRICS Summit and India-China Relations," 21 July 2014

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
A 'New Era' of Democracy in Taiwan: Implications for Regional Security & Economy

IPCS Forecast: China in 2015

Securing India's Interests in the Indian Ocean: New Strategies and Approaches

China and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: A New Regional Order?

China's End Game in Hong Kong

Contemporary Foreign Policy of China: Legacy of Deng Xiaoping

US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue: Lessons for India

The Malabar Exercises: India, Japan and the US

China 2013: New Leadership

China and Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ): Political Objectives and International Responses

The Positives

China and Southeast Asia: What is the Strategy behind the Maritime Silk Road?

China and Myanmar: The Great Game of the Gas Pipeline

China and the US: Fifth Strategic and Economic Dialogue

Xi-Obama Summit

Quest for Energy Security

India and China: What did the Salman Khurshid and Li Keqiang Visits Achieve?

China: Engaging Nepal as a Land Port

China: Contextualising the Anti-Access Area-Denial Strategy

China and the Asia-Pacific: Trends, Challenges and Dilemmas

Second Sino- Indian Strategic Economic Dialogue: A SWOT Analysis

China: Reasons for being a Top FDI Destination

IPCS Discussion: Sino-Indian and Sino-South Korean Relations

IPCS Discussion: China's Role in North Korea's Stability and Regional Security

Yang Yechi in Southeast Asia: A fruitful Visit?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.