Home Contact Us
Search :
   

India - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#3322, 28 January 2011
 
Alternative Strategies for J&K: Before Next Summer
D Suba Chandran
Director, IPCS
email: subachandran@gmail.com
 

One ought to applaud the State and Union governments for standing up to the BJP’s march to Lal Chowk in Srinagar to hoist the Indian flag. It was expected that the State government (with support from New Delhi) would allow the BJP yatra to enter the Valley, and leave it to the security forces to physically prevent them from entering Srinagar. Thankfully, there was no political paralysis on the issue and matters were handed over to the security forces in Kashmir. In perhaps one of the clearest policy moves yet, the government prevented the BJP yatra from crossing Jammu. What next?

The BJP, from its initiation, was never serious about protecting any long-term national interests. It emphasized cheap publicity for narrow political gains; perhaps, even during the current crisis, the BJP may have scored some points amongst the Hindu community in the Jammu region. One will not of course disagree with the BJP in terms of hoisting the national flag in Lal Chowk because legally and politically, J&K is a part of India and hence every citizen has a right to hoist the national flag. The issue, rather, is of the mind; of the hoisting of perspectives and values in the mind of every Kashmiri.

This needs a long-term vision, and strategies to achieve it. Why does a majority perceive the Indian flag as an imposition? Why do Kashmiri intellectuals repeatedly emphasize that Indian political values relating to good governance, human rights and democracy have never crossed the Banihal/Jawahar tunnel?

While the governments have avoided a show-down, this is only a temporary relief. What must then be done? Discussions of a hot summer in the Valley are already underway; and there are three specific reasons for this. First and foremost, the youth unrest in the Kashmir valley, which is being expressed (or/and manipulated by mainstream and separatist elements) periodically. Violence in the Kashmir valley in the last few years has become seasonal; all it takes is a trigger to unleash the situation and bring the youths to the streets with stones in their hands.

Second, Pakistan will try to reposition itself in J&K after having lost its edge in the last few years. The security forces fear that a process is already set in motion and could blow up during this summer. While the Valley is not inclined towards terrorism, one cannot totally discount the fear that Kashmiri youths may be tempted to explore alternative strategies.

Third, there seems to be a wave gripping Muslim societies of the Middle East and North Africa, starting with Tunisia, now reaching Egypt. While the situation and reasons are not comparable, one should not completely overrule the impact of global developments in the minds of Kashmiri youth.

How can a disastrous development be averted? The interlocutors appointed by the Indian government have done their homework. New Delhi should work with the government of J&K and take small but sincere steps. At least three steps are essential. First, an element of demilitarization, at least in select areas. The government in J&K and thelocal police have repeatedly emphasized that they should be able to secure the urban areas - at least certain select towns in the Valley, starting with Srinagar. If not the entire valley, New Delhi should make an announcement immediately or at least propose a time-table for the relocation of troops from urban areas.

Second, the Union government also should seriously reconsider its decision to continue with the AFSPA. This has become a political issue in the Valley and hence could become a very significant confidence-building measure. Especially, if the local government and police force is confident of securing the urban areas, there is no reason for the Union government to be apprehensive about removing the AFSPA from urban areas. Both the above issues are interlinked and need to be undertaken by the Union government. What is more important is also an announcement of panchayat elections; this in fact will do wonders in the Kashmir valley. Governance, especially through panchayats, is the biggest weapon and protection (and not the police or Army) that the governments at the Union and State levels have in the area. However, they are reluctant to use it for narrow political reasons.

The national flag has an emotional meaning for everyone. One can neither be forced to hoist it, nor should one attempt to hoist the flag in a place where such gestures are not universally supported. The real challenge is not hoisting the Indian flag in Lal Chowk. The action itself is the easiest thing to do. The real challenge is instilling sensitized values and hoisting the mind to educated thought and action.

 
Article by same Author
Pakistan Elections 2013: A Preliminary Analysis

Dragon in Ladakh: Deciphering Chinese long term interests

Iran, Islam and Nuclear Weapons: Engage Teheran instead of Isolating

Core, Periphery and Indian Foreign Policy: The growing divide between Delhi and sub-regions

Pir Panjal International Festival: Marketing Rajouri, Poonch, Bhaderwah and Basholi

India, Pakistan and the Nuclear Race: No Clear Winners

Mullahs to Monks: Why is our Clergy Angry and Violent?

Pakistan Elections 2013: Movers, Shakers and Losers

Myanmar: US, China and An Eastern Great Game?

The Indo-Pacific: India’s Look East 3.0

Early Warning and Peace Alert: Transforming Rajouri & Poonch in J&K

J&K after Afzal Guru: Immediate Excuse and Inherent Problems

Reading Pakistan: Why Target Health Workers Administering Vaccinations?

Af-Pak Diary: Decoding Hakimullah Mehsud’s Talks Offer

Af-Pak Diary: Are Regional Differences over Afghanistan Irreconcilable?

Af-Pak Diary: A Region-Led, Region-Owned Solution for Afghanistan

Obama-II and the Af-Pak: Worst is Yet to Come?

Malala: Is Pakistan Externalizing an Internal Problem?

Attack on Pakistan’s Kamra Airbase: What Next for Pakistan and the TTP?

India’s Nuclear Doctrine: How Elastic and Transparent should it be?

IPCS Debate: Targeted Killings as a Counter-Naxal Strategy

Reading Pakistan: What Next After the Judicial Coup, My Lord?

Radha Vinod Raju: A Tribute

Conflict Alert: Rohingyas, Rakhines and Regional Security

Pakistan: Declining Foreign Direct Investment

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2013, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com