Home Contact Us  

India & the World - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1341, 18 March 2004
The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response I
Maj. Gen. Dipankar Banerjee
Director, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies

The Backdrop

Sandwiched between China and India, Nepal occupies a strategic location in South Asia astride the high Himalayan ranges. It had little contact with China in the past. Its ties with India have been intimate and long, developed over centuries of common history, culture, religion and commerce. Since 1815 when General Amar Singh Thapa’s unvanquished army marched out with arms from the Malaun Fort in Himachal, the two countries have remained intertwined through their military connection. Possibly about eighty thousand soldiers serve in the Indian security forces (more than half in the Army) and in the numerous para-military and police organisations. Approximately Rs 900 crores (US $ 200 million) are transferred from India every year for pay and pensions of Nepalese citizens working in the government of India. Probably many hundreds of crores more are remitted from non-official sectors.

Relations between India and Nepal are unique and closer than between any two sovereign nations anywhere in the world. Yet, over the last fifty years there have arisen misunderstandings affecting mutual relations. A new challenge presents itself today in the emerging Maoist insurgency in Nepal.

Recent Developments

Nepal entered an era of democratic governance in 1990 with high expectations but little preparation. Over the next dozen years, ten governments, led by one political party after another and several combinations among them, ruled the country with equal incompetence. Ministers fought over power and pelf and the spoils of office, through government contracts and outright bribes, impoverishing the land and its people. They discredited themselves and undermined the democratic process, particularly in the countryside where all possibilities of economic development or governance vanished. Burgeoning population and absence of employment opportunities at home, combined with the above proved explosive and inevitably led to the Maoist insurgency

Leftist forces have long existed on the fringes in Nepal. In 1994 a more extremist group withdrew from electoral politics and from 13 February 1996 launched a Maoist uprising. Led by Pushpa Kumar Dahal (Prachanda) and the ideologue Dr Baburam Bhattarai, the Maoists put out first a 40 point demand. The first five of these were set against India giving expression to all the traditional anti-Indian polemics of Nepal. Remainder were an agenda for a revolutionary Marxist revolution. While the uprising developed in the countryside, politics of opportunism continued as usual in Kathmandu. The first ‘strike’ by the Maoists was called in the capital in the autumn of 2000. In these turbulent conditions a regicide occurred in which the entire Royal family was assassinated by the young prince in June 2001. The King’s less popular younger brother assumed the mantle of kingship amidst rumours of conspiracy and worse.

Political instability too continued and a new Prime Minister Sher Bahadur Deuba assumed office leading a faction of the Nepali Congress. Elections were to follow, but conditions in the country precluded holding it and he extended his tenure. In October 2002 the King dismissed the Prime Minister and in a constitutional coup installed a new government under a favourably inclined Prime Minister, in effect assuming direct political rule.

The Insurgency

Counter insurgency in the early years was fought entirely by the civil police. Later a force of 15,000 armed police were specially raised and equipped with self loading rifles. They still remain untrained and under equipped. When the Maoists struck at the Royal Nepal Army (RNA) in November 2001 killing a large numbers of soldiers in Dang, the Army was compelled to intervene. In the last two years of insurgency alone about 8000 persons have lost their lives, with about 75 per cent  (according to the RNA), belonging to the Maoist cadre. Yet, a rough estimate of the current cadre strength of the Maoists is said to be 5,500 combatants of which about one third are armed, 8,000 militias, 4,500 cadres and 33,000 hardcore followers. Passive supporters are likely to be in hundreds of thousands.

The Maoists control much of the countryside. While it is true that no place has been ‘liberated’ and the RNA can go anywhere at will, it is only by flying in by Indian or US supplied helicopters. All of the countryside except the District headquarters belongs to the insurgents by day and especially at night. They remain capable of mounting coordinated brigade size attacks with 1,500 soldiers in many parts of the country, even though these may not be entirely successful.

The RNA strength is under sixty thousand. There are plans to increase it to 75,000 soldiers now and soon there will need to be an army of over a lakh. It is now better equipped with Indian and somewhat lesser quantities of US arms, particularly M-16 rifles. It is increasingly receiving good training and has high exposure to UN peacekeeping operations. Yet, its combat capability against well motivated Maoist insurgents in the large and difficult terrain of Nepal will remain in doubt at least for several years more. The question is does Nepal have the time?

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China at 60 - The Military Dimension

China's Defence White Paper- Part 2

China's New Defence White Paper- Part 1

Towards a More Secure World (Part 2) - The UN High Level Panel's Report

Engaging Pakistan - The Composite Dialogue Process

India-China Border Talks

Policy to Counter Hostage-taking

Kashmir: A Trip Report

Future Threats: Challenges and Collective Actions

Nepal: Current Situation and Future Challenges

The Crisis in Nepal and Indias Response II

The SAARC Summit and After

The War in Sri Lanka

India-Pakistan Imbroglio over CBMs

International Security Environment – III: Challenges to India

International Security Environment – II: A Brief Overview of the International Environment

International Security Environment – I: Recent Developments and Characteristics of the Era

Jiang's US Visit: The Strategic Perspective

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.