Home Contact Us
Search :
   

India & the World - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1444, 27 July 2004
 
Policy to Counter Hostage-taking
Maj. Gen. Dipankar Banerjee
Director, IPCS
 

The recent incident of three Indians taken hostage in Iraq has highlighted once again the dangerous world we live in. Hostages have been taken throughout history. What makes it so urgent today is its increasing link with international terrorism. This evil is spreading and few nations will be spared its terrible impact. It is important to be clear about what it entails and how to respond.

 

Kidnapping and hostage taking have emerged as a major weapon of coercion in Iraq. It is also often a purely criminal act for profit. Absence of law and order, enormous quantities of readily available weapons, little employment and something of a ‘cause’, provide enough cover for it to flourish. It is to be hoped that this situation will end well, for it appears to be a criminal act and there is little leverage with the terrorists. But, the Indian state has the responsibility and indeed a duty to protect its citizens wherever they are and whatever be their conditions and take necessary counter measures. 

 

Let us have no illusion that this will be the last incident in Iraq or elsewhere. Hence, it is time to ponder Indian doctrine and policy to deal with such an eventuality. I suggest we have had neither in the past and have responded entirely in an ad hoc manner and seldom effectively.  

 

The Rubaiyya Sayyid kidnapping in December 1989 is perhaps the worst example in recent history anywhere. The complete capitulation of the Indian state was arguably the single most important cause for the subsequent insurgency in Jammu & Kashmir. It also set a terrible precedence. By meeting every demand of the terrorists, the Government sent a clear message everywhere that it will surrender if its senior officials were to be the victims. A decade later at the Millennium eve aircraft hijack case, the plea of the victims’ families was that no difference should be made now in their case. The Indian state then not only capitulated once again, but the foreign minister personally escorted the released criminals to Kandahar. The errors of commission and omission in both situations were staggering.

 

It is important and necessary to be clear about future action. National response has to be at two distinct levels.  One is operational, that is the mechanisms and procedures for response. This will include clear responsibilities, designated channels of command, well trained capabilities, necessary resources, fine tuning modalities for operation, creating competence in negotiating techniques and others. But, this cannot operate without clarity at the first level, that of doctrine and policy.

 

Faced with blackmail through hostages what should be the national response? There can only be one single option. That is: never ever surrender to the blackmail demands of criminals. A sovereign nation that values its honour, independence and respect among the comity of nations and wishes for independence of action, cannot allow itself to be held to ransom. Besides, submitting to the demands of terrorists is not a policy, but the absence of policy and capitulation only encourages future blackmail. There is no dearth of examples from around the world that shows clearly how each situation of surrender only encourages future hostage taking. The national doctrine in hostage situations must then be a clear no surrender policy.

 

This does not entail that there will be no negotiation. Indeed, skilful negotiation is an integral part of tactics in evolving a rescue plan and to break down the resistance of the terrorists. But, at all times there should be a clear resolve that there will be no surrender to blackmail.

 

Following from that, the state must declare, whatever the condition, wherever the terrorists, the nation will make every effort and spare no resource to bring them to justice. This will not merely be informing the Interpol, but exploring the possibility of every overt and covert means to bring pressure on the gangs as well as individuals who perpetrate these acts. There will be issues of international law as well as other constraints over operations and it is not my contention that these should be violated. But within reasonable limits every effort must be made to respond pro-actively.

 

This will not be a policy that will be easy to sell at home. Long used to a soft state which can be pressured over every factional interest and which has succumbed to pressures more often than it has resisted, a sudden shift in policy will be neither easy to declare nor implement. But, then we are today in a new war, which is being fought with new rules or perhaps absence of rules, where there are no clear frontiers and no recognisable enemy. Given these ambiguities in today’s world, doctrinal clarity and clear policy are vital for national security.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Stability in 2015
Sri Lanka: Making a Case for Change
Connecting Sri Lanka: Train to Jaffna
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Burying the Past: A New Beginning for Pakistan and Afghanistan
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Bangladesh: Diplomatic Manoeuvres at the UNGA
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism’s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
IPCS Forecast: East Asia in 2015
China-North Korea: Reasons for Reconciliation
Abe-Jinping Summit Meet: A Thaw in China-Japan Relations?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?
The Future of SAARC is Now

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ‘Look East’ to ‘Act East’
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
India’s Northeast: Need for a New Anti-Terror Policy
India-China: Securitising Water
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015
India and Maritime Security: Do More
Indian Ocean and the IORA: Search and Rescue Operations

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
IPCS Forecast: Left-wing Extremism in 2015
Maoist Attack on the CRPF: Time for New Counter-strategies
Naxal Violence: Challenges to Jharkhand Polls

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
18th SAARC Summit: An Economic Agenda
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security
Obama’s New Strategy towards the Islamic State: Implications for India

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
IPCS Forecast: West Asia in 2015
Rise of the Islamic State: Implications for the Arab World
Islamic State: The Efficacy of Counter-strategies
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
The Af-Pak Entity: Seduction to Armageddon?
Maritime Combat Power in the Indo-Pacific
Of Lawrence, Sykes-Picot and al-Baghdadi
Voice from America
Amit Gupta
Obama’s Rapprochement with Cuba
China's Global Ambition: Need to Emulate Germany
Mid-Term Elections: So What If the US Swings Hard Right?


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China at 60 - The Military Dimension

China's Defence White Paper- Part 2

China's New Defence White Paper- Part 1

Towards a More Secure World (Part 2) - The UN High Level Panel's Report

Engaging Pakistan - The Composite Dialogue Process

India-China Border Talks

Kashmir: A Trip Report

Future Threats: Challenges and Collective Actions

Nepal: Current Situation and Future Challenges

The Crisis in Nepal and India’s Response II

The Crisis in Nepal and India’s Response I

The SAARC Summit and After

The War in Sri Lanka

India-Pakistan Imbroglio over CBMs

International Security Environment – III: Challenges to India

International Security Environment – II: A Brief Overview of the International Environment

International Security Environment – I: Recent Developments and Characteristics of the Era

Jiang's US Visit: The Strategic Perspective

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2015
 January  February  March  April  May
 2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007
 2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999
 1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1900, Tel: 91-11-4100-1901, Tel/Fax: 91-11-4100-1902

Email:
© Copyright 2015, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com