Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

India & the world - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#3551, 9 January 2012
 
Pakistan: Will Democracy Prevail?
Radha Vinod Raju
Distinguished Fellow, IPCS and Former Director General, National Investigation Agency (NIA)
email: radhavinodraju@gmail.com
 

President Asif Ali Zardari and his Prime Minister Yusuf Raza Gilani are having a pretty tough time in Pakistan-just to survive the consequences of ‘Memogate’. The allegation of businessman MansoorIjaz that he had prepared the memo on the instructions of Pakistan’s US Ambassador Hussain Haqqani and had the clearance from the very top, is yet to be proved, but it has shaken the country as nothing else has in recent times. Haqqani was summoned by his government and then resigned, though he claimed he had nothing to do with the memo and was prepared to face any enquiry. The memo was an alleged plea from President Zardari, soon after the US’ secret operation of 2 May 2011 in Abbotabad which ended with the killing of Osama bin Laden showing the Pakistan military in poor light, for help from the US military to stave off a military coup in his own country.

The Pakistani Army appeared complicit in keeping bin Laden, the world’s most wanted terrorist, hidden from the rest of the world in a safe house a mile from their military Academy, and sleeping when the US’ Seals flew into Abbotabad and slewed him. Zardari allegedly feared that the Army’s reaction to the humiliation would be a coup against his government. The alleged  memo was a plea from the civilian government to the US to prevent the coup, in return for which  there would be an “independent and accountable inquiry” into the Osama bin Laden raid, setting up a new “national security team” to support the decisions of the US administration, giving a “green light” for future US kill-or-capture operations on Pakistani soil, disbanding and eliminating certain units within the ISI and arresting those from Pakistani intelligence agencies who allegedly masterminded or supported the Mumbai attacks.

While the civilian government ordered an enquiry by a Parliamentary panel on security into the scandal, several petitions, led by Nawaz Sharif’s Pakistan Muslim League, were filed in the Supreme Court for a judicial enquiry. In response to the Supreme Court’s notice, the government took a stand that there was no need for the court to intervene as an enquiry was on by the Parliamentary panel. In an unprecedented move, the Army Chief, General Parvez Kayani and his ISI Chief General Shuja Pasha, took a diametrically opposite stand, without prior clearance from the government, asking for an enquiry into the Memogate scandal on the ground that the memo does exist. The Ministry of Defence, headed by another retired general, without clearance of the Defence Minister, said that they have no operational control over the Army and its operations. There were rumours following the stand of the generals that the Army Chief and the ISI Chief were about to be replaced by the government. These rumours have since subsided. And the Supreme Court has now ordered an enquiry by a Commission consisting of three Chief Justices of High Courts into the scandal directing them to submit their report in a month’s time.

When the Army and the ISI appeared on losing ground following the American raid in Abbotabad, the Prime Minister had rushed to their rescue by blaming the whole world for not locating Osama bin Laden in the Army’s backyard! That was the moment to call the Army to account, and try for civilian control over the armed forces. Having lost this defining moment, Gilani lost the best opportunity that the civilians had of taking control of the Army. Once again, after the American/NATO attack on the Pakistani posts killing 24 Pakistani soldiers, Gilani meekly followed the Army’s script, stalling NATO supplies passing through Pakistan, asking the Americans to clear out of Shamsi base and boycotting the Bonn Conference on Afghanistan.

It appears that the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court holds important cards-his relations with President Zardari cannot be said to be cordial ever since the latter’s dilly dallying in reinstating the Chief Justice after assuming power in Pakistan. While the Army has its own problems dealing with militants and a hostile western boundary, and is yet to recover from the shock of the American intrusion into Abbotabad, it appears that they are not interested in a coup which can increase their problems. It is reported that they are backing the rising new star in Pakistan, Imran Khan.

A finding by the Judicial Commission that there was a memo as claimed by MansoorIjaz, giving it credibility, could be the last straw on the camel’s back, forcing Zardari’s resignation, and elections in Pakistan. There is a strong view in the country that the politicians were ready to sell out Pakistan’s security to the Americans for their survival.

The political leadership has failed to earn any credit for itself in the last four years since it came to power. When Pakistan had unprecedented floods a couple of years back, Zardari was holidaying in his villa in Paris, while the Army and the Jamaat-ud-Dawa volunteers took care of the victims of the floods. The principal focus of the politicians appeared to be survival, and completion of their five year term-governance was not their concern. If democracy finally loses out, politicians in Pakistan will have none other than themselves to blame.

 
Article by same Author
Ghulam Nabi Fai Indictment: Regional Implications

Ghulam Nabi Fai and the ISI

NATO Strike in Pakistan: Need for a Joint Probe

Kayani's Latest Gestures

Tahawwur Rana Verdict: Implications for India

The Killing of Ilyas Kashmir: Implications for al Qaeda and India

David Headley’s Disclosures-I: How Do they Help India’s Case?

After Osama - I: How will this Affect India?

Can the Taliban be convinced to renounce al Qaeda?

Pakistan and Militant Groups in Kashmir: Musharraf’s Admission

Countering the Naxal Threat – II: a Case for Specialized Units

Countering the Naxal Threat – I: An Analysis of Earlier Efforts

Ajmal Kasab: A Mile Stone in Investigation, Trial and Due Process

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design India Internet