Home Contact Us
Search :
   

India & the World - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#3337, 4 March 2011
 
BASIC Needs a New Strategy
Swaran Singh
Professor, Diplomacy & Disarmament, CIPOD, JNU
email: drswaransingh@gmail.com
 

New Delhi hosted the sixth meeting of the Environment Ministers of Brazil, South Africa, India and China (BASIC) on 26-27 February. The most discernible and interesting development in the meeting was its 'BASIC plus' format which showed that BASIC has emerged in the forefront of climate change mitigation negotiations, continues to ensure minimum intra-BASIC cohesiveness as also its frequent meetings and that it has received an increasing global endorsement of its leadership.

The 'BASIC plus' meeting in New Delhi, for instance, included representatives from Argentina, Algeria and the Maldives who currently occupy an important place in climate change negotiations. While Argentina is currently the Chair of the G-77 Group, Algeria chairs the Africa Group and the Maldives is Chairman of the Alliance of Small and Island States (AOSIS) at the climate change negotiations. For the first time, these three attended the BASIC Environment Ministers’ meeting as special invitees of the quartet that was formed in November 2009 in Beijing. The New Delhi meeting, therefore, indicated possibilities of BASIC showing signs of expanding its membership and influence in coming times.

This was the first international meeting on climate change negotiations since the COP-16 was held in Cancun (Mexico) last December which was celebrated as a success, unlike  the COP-15 at Copenhagen in 2009, for it had managed to cobble together an Agreement, even if it was weak and limited. Accordingly, the New Delhi BASIC meeting was aimed, first of all, at preparing rules and modalities for implementing the Cancun Agreement. Secondly, this was also an attempt at finalizing joint strategies for the forthcoming April meeting in Bangkok of the two Ad-hoc Working Groups (AWGs) of the United Nations Framework Convention for Climate Change (UNFCCC) respectively on Long-term Cooperative Action (LCA) and Kyoto Protocol (KP). And finally, this meeting was also important to kick-start a momentum for the COP-17 to be held in Durban in December this year.

Discussions, amongst others, revolved around how to approach the Kyoto Protocol in its Second Commitment Period and action in emission reduction beyond the current phase that ends in 2012. For this, the BASIC ministers’ Joint Statement underlined “the need to maintain balance between the obligations of the developed countries vis-à-vis those of developing countries.” Their deliberations also highlighted the challenges within BASIC formulations. For instance, South Africa and the other three countries have different perspectives on the ‘peaking year’ and ‘mitigation responsibilities’ amongst various categories. The BASIC experts were assigned in New Delhi the task of preparing 'a synthesis document' to be considered in their next meeting. At the same time, they emphasized the criticality of evolving consensus amongst developed countries for launching the post-2012 Second Commitment Period under the Kyoto Protocol to achieve ambitious emission reduction goals.

With regard to the forthcoming Durban COP-17, the Environment Ministers pledged to bring back the focus on the Bali Action Plan of COP-14 of 2007. Issues of equity, trade and intellectual property rights, they said, had gone missing at Cancun Agreement and they underlined the need to bring back the focus on these issues. The also urged the need for taking head-on the Second Commitment to Kyoto Protocol and Fast Trace Finance which they described as the two most important issues for the success of climate change mitigation in coming times. They emphasized how only a negligible amount of money came out of the funding that was promised at the Copenhagen Conference of 2009 for mitigation effort amongst the least developed and island countries. This issue, they said, is likely to cloud the Durban meeting.

At the Copenhagen grand bargain, rich nations had promised to disburse $30 billion in ‘fast start finance’ to the poorest and most affected, which included island states, African and least developed countries. But developed nations have since hardly followed this commitment and have tried to pass-off their bilateral support to relatively better off countries as part of ‘fast start finance’ which threatens to block any breakthrough at the coming Durban meeting. The United States, for instance, has shown $26 million to India as part of their fast start finance. Similarly, the European Union shows their aid to Brazil in the same category. This is turning red any hope of starting negotiations on the Green Climate Fund as the “fast start finance” has proved ineffective.

Brazilian Minister Izabella Teixiera perhaps was the one to hit the nail on its head perfectly when she said that to move any further BASIC needed ‘a new political strategy’. It is expected that this would involve not just ‘common but differential commitments’ but ‘commitment from everybody’ and this shift in semantics seems to move BASIC a step ahead from being ‘norm-takers’ to ‘norm-makers’ on climate change negotiations. However, the challenge ahead for BASIC lies in pushing its agenda to more ambitious levels and in expanding its membership without diluting its strength and spirit.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Om Prakash,
"Carbon Footprint Reduction," 11 December 2009

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
China-India: Courting Closer Confidence

BRICS Summit: A Paradigm Shift?

China-India: Return to Robust Relations?

Obama’s Nuclear Security Summit: Case for Indo-US Partnership?

Hu Jintao’s enduring Tibet connection

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com