Home Contact Us  

East Asia: Japan, Australia and the Koreas - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4215, 13 December 2013
Purge in North Korea: Domestic and China Factors
Sandip Kumar Mishra
Assistant Professor, Korean Studies, University of Delhi and Visiting Fellow, IPCS
Email: sandipmishra10@hotmail.com

It seems to be the beginning of a decisive twist in North Korean domestic politics as well as North Korea’s relations with China with the ouster of Jang Song-thaek, Vice Chairman of the National Defence Commission and uncle of the North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. In North Korean domestic politics, it may herald an era of full control of Kim Jong-un without any patronage. Jang Song-thaek, who is married to Kim Kyung-hui, sister of Kim Jong-il, was supposed to work as the patron, guide and chief advisor of Kim Jong-un after his appointment in 2011. Apparently, he enjoyed a key position in the political affairs of North Korea and could be called the chief executive of the ‘succession project’. It was considered remarkable that he was successful in accomplishing his responsibilities smoothly.

Jang Song-thaek was considered an efficient organiser and so, even though he was demoted a few times during Kim Jong-il’s era, he was chosen to be the main facilitator of the succession process. The reason for the trust was that he was experienced, pragmatic, had family relations with the Kim clan, and had close contact with China. However, Kim Jong-il was not sure about his future aspirations. So, he was promoted to be the unofficial caretaker of young Kim Jong-un, but reportedly, more than 200 of his supporters were purged from party positions before his promotion, and his wife Kim Kyung-hui was also prominently brought into the loop to have control over any possible disloyalty.

It is interesting to note that there are two opposite views on his purge. According to one view, it symbolises full control by Kim Jong-un on the North Korean system and confidence that he can manage without him. However, according to another view, if Kim Jong-un himself did not take the decision, then it means that a dangerous power struggle has begun in North Korea. It was earlier considered that military was not in the driving seat in North Korea under the new leader. Kim Jong-un removed military general Ri Yong-ho and introduced a few economic reform plans in which it was not required to take permission from the military to start an industry. It was considered that the new leader had full control over the military. However, the purge of Jang Song-thaek, who was considered to be from a pro-civilian group, makes it clear that either the military has been trying to re-assert itself or Kim Jong-un has got full control over even political elites in the country. Thus, there is no clear answer to whether the purge means North Korea is going to be more open to economic reform or move away from it. Jang was associated with North Korean special economic zones (SEZs) set up with China, and it would be difficult to say whether it means that the recent North Korean announcement to establish fourteen more SEZs would be delayed/stopped or organised according to different rules and conditions.

A very significant implication for Jang’s removal would be on North Korea’s relations with China. He was considered to be close to Chinese leaders and there are speculations that by his removal, Kim Jong-un wants to send a strong message to China. Apparently there was some friction in North Korea’s relations with China, especially after the third North Korean nuclear test in February 2013. China was considered to be cooperating with international community to impose sanctions, and reportedly forced North Korea to engage in talks with South Korea in June 2013. China has also been pestering North Korea to restart Six-Party talks, even though North Korea is not willing to do so. Kim Jong-un has not been able to visit China after his inauguration and it shows some distance between North Korea and China under his rule.

With the purge of arguably the most important link with China, Kim Jong-un wants to convey to China that the regime can afford to get by without China. China constitutes the most important window for North Korea to the outside world and it would not be easy for North Korea to do away with official and unofficial help and concessions from China. If the purge of Jang Song-thaek by Kim Jong-un is largely seen through the lens of his uncomfortable relations with China, it would mean severe desperation on the part of Pyongyang may lead to a major upheaval in North Korea and in the region. However, if the purge is largely caused by domestic factors, North Korea might try to find the next link with China and try to replace the role of Jang in North Korea-China relations.

In the entire scenario, the purge of Jang Song-thaek is indeed a serious indication that everything is not well inside the ‘closed country’, and it may prove to be beginning of a real tumultuous phase for North Korea. Either North Korea will survive and Kim Jong-un will emerge more powerful and in control, or it will lead tothe  disintegration of the regime.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Sandip Kumar Mishra,
"North Korea: Beginning of the End?," 26 December 2013
Rajaram Panda,
"The Renewed Dialogue Offer," 18 June 2013
Narayani Basu,
"IPCS Discussion: Recent Crisis & Domestic Politics on the Korean Peninsula," 30 April 2013

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
'Comfort Women' and the Japan-South Korea Relationship

Denial and Provocation: Failure of US' North Korea Policy

Trump's Visit to East Asia

Shinzo Abe’s North Korea Strategy

North Korea: Testing the Limits of US-South Korea Relations

The US' Acrobatic Responses to the North Korean Riddle

Japan’s ‘New Approach’ to Russia: Is it Moving Forward?

India and the Koreas: Promises and Follow-ups

South Korea-North Korea: A New Version of Engagement

Trump’s North Korea Policy: Regional Implications

Park Geun-hye's Impeachment and South Korean Foreign Policy

US Tactical Nukes in the Korean Peninsula?

Forecast 2017: East Asia

Japan-China Contestation in 2017

Donald Trump and East Asia

PM Modi’s Visit to Japan: Prospects and Prudence

Future of the TPP and the US' Pivot to Asia

Russia’s Overtures in East Asia

China’s Game on North Korea

Six-Party Talks 2.0: Not for Denuclearisation but for Peace

Deadlock at Shangri-La: Is There a Way Forward?

North Korea’s 7th Party Congress: Context and Content

Japan’s New Security Laws: Context and Implications

What is the Efficacy of Sanctions on North Korea?

‘Brilliant’ Comrade: The Design in North Korean Madness

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.