Home Contact Us  
   

East Asia: Japan, Australia and the Koreas - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4167, 7 November 2013
 
Japan & China: Room for Rapproachment?
Angana Guha Roy
Research Intern, IPCS
Email: anganaguharoy@gmail.com
 

fJapan and China commemorated the 35th anniversary of their Bilateral Treaty of Peace and Friendship in a low key symposium in October this year. The commemoration coincided with the pessimism that marked their recent row over Senkaku Island and the Japanese delegate’s visit to Yasukuni Shrine. These two major economies are rivals inducing threat perception in the other. On the one hand, China has an active weapons programme supported by a strong expanding defence budget that has grown by double-digit rates for 17 consecutive years. On the other hand, although Japan has a relatively low military profile, with its ‘no-war’ constitution and strong alliance with the US, its defence-relevant technology is sophisticated enough to challenge its neighbour.

Their century-old hostile relationship has prevented East Asia from progressing towards any idea of designing a regional security architecture to ensure peaceful development. In the wake of the existing state of affairs, few noticeable rapprochement efforts have been adopted over the years to ease the prevailing tension .The question is, how effective have the rapprochement efforts been in offering peacemaking solutions? What could be other plausible ways to improve the existing efforts?

An Attempt at Rapprochement
The diplomatic endeavours for rapprochement in the backdrop of the contesting governments over prevailing disputes leave little room for any compromise, no matter how many CBM or CMMs come their way to offer solutions. The most interesting part is that the print and digital media in Japan and China were simultaneously covering the commemoration of their three decade-old Friendship Treaty and their recent ‘cold-word war’ over their sovereign claims on the Senkaku/Diaoyu and the symbol of Japanese militarism, Yasukuni. This is an example of how Japan-China relations are defined by the simultaneous working of their conflict-peace dynamic.

Unfortunately, the existing peace-building efforts are ineffective and the proposed ones don’t come with an outline plan or research-based recommendation to carry forward the peace initiatives unhindered. One may cite the nine year old Tokyo-Beijing Forum in this context. It believes in the power of dialogue and public diplomacy but the prevailing rivalry has repeatedly overshadowed any sort of furtherance in their bilateral relations. This was fairly reflected in the international media that came out with reports like, ‘China-Japan relations take turn for worse’ or ‘China-Japan relations increasingly strained’, on the eve of the Beijing-Tokyo Forum conclusion.

Opinion-Based Diplomacy: A Way Forward?
Since inter-governmental diplomacy seems unable to offer any effective solutions, the Tokyo-Beijing Forum has pointed out the role the private sector can play to help resolve diplomatic problems in the long-run. The Genron NPO has come up with what can be called ‘opinion-based diplomacy’ for the kind of diplomacy that the private sector can engage in. It states that public opinion should display its power to help improve the situation. This recommendation was based on a series of recent opinion surveys in Japan and China in which about 90 per cent of respondents on both sides expressed adverse feelings toward each other's country. In the meanwhile, about 70 per cent of them recognised the importance of Japan-China relations.

A proper track II solution could also be considered, given its possibility. Professor Zheng Wang, in an article published in China-US Focus in December 2012, “From ‘Top-down’ to ‘Middle-out’: China and Japan can Reconcile Their Relationship,” explains: “In such conflicts, sustained dialogue is a more appropriate response to underlying causes. Indeed, a growing number of conflict resolution practitioners have been utilizing dialogue to transform deep-rooted conflicts...Chinese and Japanese representatives, including those considered “hard-liners” on each side, should begin meeting behind closed doors with competent facilitators. These meetings should continue at regular intervals for a period of several years. Considering the tendency of each country’s media to demonize the other, a journalists’ exchange program should be implemented to permit reporters and commentators to spend time living among the people in the other country.” 

At the end of the day, the rationality or positive outcome depends on the basis of how much attention these non-governmental initiatives (Opinion-based diplomacy or track II diplomacy) attract in comparison with government-to-government diplomacy.

Can Economic Ties Help Ride Together?
Despite the stalemate, the economic relations of the two Asian giants have improved this year after touching an historical low in 2012 post the nationalisation of Senkaku Islands, with increased business, non-governmental connections and bilateral trade. On the basis of the high dependency that the two economies share, the arena of economic cooperation could be exploited to expand the realm of engagement.

Look Back to Step Forward
Two contentious issues that figures in the bone of contention list between Japan and China bilateral are the claims of sovereignty over Senkaku Islands after Japan nationalised it, and the Japanese delegate’s visit to Yasukuni shrine. These are matters rooted in history. The question of the legitimacy of ownership and the psychological warfare over Yasukuni shrine should be enquired through history. A step back is required to take a step forward.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Annie Tacho,
"Japan & the Yasukuni Shrine: Regional Implications of an Assertive Abe," 17 August 2013
Shresht Jain,
"China, Japan & South Korea: Emerging Security Architecture in East Asia," 12 August 2013
Rishika Chauhan,
"Book Review: Assessing Asian Military Strategies," 25 March 2013
Rana Divyank Chaudhary,
"China: How bad does the Japan-US alliance look?," 20 March 2013

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Contemporary East Asia

India-South Korea: President Park Geun-hye and ‘Sales Diplomacy’

Japan 2013: Abenomics

China and Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ): Assertive Unilateralism?

China: First Stealth Drone

Japan’s Revised Defence Posture in 2013: An Assessment

Japan: India’s National Interests

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.