Home Contact Us  
   

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2830, 9 March 2009
 
Playing at Hide-and-Seek: Submarines in Asian Navies
Tomoko Kiyota
Research Intern, IPCS
e-mail: tomokokiyota@gmail.com
 

On 11 February 2009, Indian Defense Minister AK Antony announced that India’s programme to construct nuclear submarines was in its final stage. At the same time, the Royal Malaysian Navy’s (RMN) first submarine was delivered from France. In spite of the changed international environment since the Cold War and the reformed maritime strategies, submarines are still the capital ships of the world’s main navies. What is the role of submarines now? Why do so many countries need submarines? 

The area most eager to have submarines now is Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian countries have been trying to build up their navies since the superpowers’ withdrawal after the Cold War. The Republic of Singapore Navy (RSN) operates four Sjoormen-class submarines which were delivered from Sweden in the early 2000s. In 2005, the RSN purchased two Vastergotland-class submarines again from Sweden which will replace some of the Sjoormen-class submarines about 2010. It is reported that Vietnam got two North Korean Yugo-class submarines in 1997. The Indonesian Navy had several submarines bought from the USSR and Poland at the end of the 1950s but decommissioned all of them in the 1970s. It later bought two submarines from Germany in 1981. In 2007, Jakarta signed a US$1.2b billion defense deal with Russia that included the purchase of two submarines. The fact that these navies have submarines must be a powerful incentive for the Malaysian Navy to buy submarines. The RMN’s Scorpene submarines were ordered from France and Spain in 2002. The Royal Thai Navy too came close to joining the submarine club in the late 1990s. The navies in the region thus have several incentives to have their own submarines but the type and number purchased will be based on regional political and budgetary considerations. 

Among the Asian Navies, the Chinese Navy has the most powerful submarine-fleet. According to the Military Balance 2008, China has about 70 submarines including three ballistic-missile submarines (SSBN) which are involved in conducting frequent patrols far from the mainland. Such operations have been a big concern of Southeast Asian countries and have spurred their naval build up. Though East Asian countries also feel anxious about China and also about North Korea, this area seems more stable than the Southeast Asian region. South Korea has kept improving its submarine fleet while Taiwan on the other hand has faced political problems in its decision to go in for submarines.

In South Asia, India’s submarine procurements have been in the spotlight. The Indian Navy has 16 submarines some of which are now under a modernization programme. The Indian government has also signed an agreement for licensed production of six Scorpene submarines with France in 2005. Furthermore, in addition to its indigenous nuclear submarine project, India has agreed to lease an Akula class nuclear submarine from Russia. 

The submarine’s most important characteristic is stealth. It is able to operate even under the hostile command of the air. Although various sensor technologies including sonar have been improving, submarine stealth technologies have also kept progressing. The most effective anti-submarine weapon is, in fact another submarine. When you want to play at hide-and-seek with other navies’ submarines, you need your own submarines. Even as political ties have been improving between Asian countries, one country’s secretive behavior leads to anxieties for everyone.  

What then, about nuclear submarines? Why does India need nuclear submarines? The most advantageous point of nuclear power is that it is not necessary to charge a battery and so it is able to operate limitlessly. However, in fact, it is difficult to remain submerged more than two months at a time due to issues of maintenance, food supply, and crews’ medical and mental care. In addition, a nuclear-propelled engine is noisy, expensive and hard to scrap. However, its survivability is a certain deterrent since nuclear submarines are known to be platforms for ballistic missiles. These naval platforms will be part of the triad of the Indian government’s minimum nuclear deterrent (MND) policy.

Discussions on India having nuclear-propelled submarines have been on since the mid-1960s. The Indian nuclear submarine project, known as the Advanced Technology Vessel (ATV) started in the 1980s. The Indian Navy already has experience operating a nuclear submarine, the INS Chakra, which was leased by the Soviet in 1988 and returned in 1991. Thus, China is the only country which has nuclear submarines in Asia. The Chinese navy’s expansion is one of the reasons why Indian Navy is keen to have nuclear submarines.

The role of submarines has been changed with the times and its technology has advanced rapidly. Until World War II, the most effective use of submarines was against commercial ships as German U boats and American submarines proved. With the commissioning of the first SSBN, the USS George Washington, the submarine was recognized as a platform for missiles to attack warships and the land surface. Of course, its sea-denial capability and surveillance roles are still important. In addition, like other weapons, submarines are also status symbols for the armed forces. And since such weapons tend to lead to escalation, submarines will likely be the standard armament of Asian Navies soon.


Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Assessing Japan-India Relations: A Japanese Perspective

India-Japan Relations: Strategic Alliance not Sideshow Required

Japanís Non-nuclear Principles: Change in the Offing?

Look South Policy? Japan's Approach to India in the 21st Century

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November  December
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.