Home Contact Us
Search :
   

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#1702, 19 April 2005
 
Japan, China, South Korea and Contested History
Mohammed Badrul Alam
Miyazaki International College, Japan
 

Several demonstrations have taken place in key Chinese cities in the last two weeks. In Beijing, 8000 Chinese protested in front of Japanese high-tech companies with banners and singing patriotic songs while burning the Japanese flags. In Shenzhen, 2000 Chinese protested with a call for boycott of anti-Japanese goods such as beer and cell phones.

The immediate trigger to the latest controversy was Japanese Ministry of Education and Culture's decision to officially approve eight new textbooks which, the Chinese critics say, are a selective,  revisionist account of Japanese actions during and before World War II during its colonial occupation of China. The issue was particularly sensitive to China as Japan was in charge of most part of China until 1945 during which the infamous Nanjing massacre took place, one in which apart from rape and looting, biological and chemical weapons were alleged to have been experimented on Chinese civilians. What inflamed the case even more were two inter-related events.

One, Japan's Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi's annual visit each August to Yasukuni shrine near Tokyo that was dedicated to the souls of Japan's war dead including convicted criminals had continued unabated albeit in a private and non-official way.

Two, disagreements over a group of islands in East China Sea which Japan calls the Senkaku islands and China calls Diaoyu. Both China and Japan claim these group of islands to be its own.

Furthermore, one has to see this issue in context as both China and Japan are yet to agree on acceptable, demarcated maritime border in East China Sea with possible oil and natural gas reserve. Needless to say, both China and Japan are heavily dependent on imported energy, and hence both the countries are actively seeking new sources of energy to sustain and promote their respective economies.

Finally, Japan (along with India, Germany and Brazil) has been actively pursuing for its inclusion at various multilateral and international forums in an expanded United Nations Security Council, as and when it takes place. If the UN Security Council reform idea goes forward and picks up steam, it would mean a reduced importance on matters related to Asia for Beijing, where China is till now the only nation representing it  in the exclusive Group of 5 with veto rights.

As far as Japan-South Korea spat is concerned, the South Korean government has taken strong exception to Japanese government's approval of a civics textbook supporting Japan's claim to a cluster of islands on the Sea of Japan held by South Korea which it calls as Dokodo and are called Takeshima in Japan.

Japan had taken control of the uninhabited islets in the Sea of Japan in 1905 as it was expanding its sphere of influence during the Meiji era. In spite of South Korea's claim of historical ownership over these islands, Japan had consistently maintained these islands as its own. Although South Korea since the 1950s stationed small contingent of South Korean Police units, Japan had claimed these islets as these were surrounded by rich fishing waters so crucial to Japan's economy.

Like in the case of China, Korea was also colonized by Japan from 1910 to 1945 and many Koreans even from today's generation feel deeply hurt due to Japanese Red Army's war time crimes that were committed against Korean citizens and on the highly sensitive issue of 'comfort women' as well as Japan's refusal to issue an unconditional apology and failure to offer due monetary compensation.

On the face of it, these controversies may suggest that in Northeast Asia, bilateral relationship between China and Japan on the one hand and that of Japan and South Korea on the other are perhaps heading downward. But one has to remember that Japan is world's second largest economy and in order to maintain that edge and lead, Japan will not do anything to jeopardize its burgeoning trade with China which is now Japan's biggest trading partner, having overtaken the United States.

For diffusing the textbook issue, the recent proposal of Japanese Foreign minister, Nobutaka Machimra could be pursued. He proposed at the Japan-China foreign ministerial meeting for a joint, collaborative history research project so as to view and analyse carefully the opposing viewpoints and which in turn might deepen the mutual understanding. This may follow the lead of Japan-South Korea joint history research project whose work is already in progress and into intense discussions.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary

D Suba Chandran
Across the Durand Line: Who is in Control Now? Will That Change?
Taliban Talks and the Four Horsemen: Between Peace and Apocalypse
Pakistan: Talks about Talks with the Taliban, Again
Dateline Islamabad

Salma Malik
Pakistan and TTP: Dialogue or Military Action?
The Musharraf Trial & Beyond

Dateline Kabul

Mariam Safi
Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?
Dhaka Discourse

Prof Delwar Hossain
Bangladesh: Domestic Politics and External Actors
Bangladesh Post Elections 2014: Redefining Domestic Politics?

Eagle Eye

Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
US in Asia: A 'Non-Alignment' Strategy?
Indo-US Strategic Partnership Post Khobragade: The Long Shadow
East Asia Compass

Dr Sandip Mishra
North Korean Peace Gestures and Inter-Korea Relations
Japan: Implications of Indiscriminate Assertiveness
China, Japan, Korea and the US: Region at Crossroads

Himalayan Frontier

Pramod Jaiswal
Chinese Inroads to Nepal
Constituent Assembly-II: Rifts Emerging
Nepal: The Crisis over Proportional Representation and the RPP Divide
Maritime Matters

Vijay Sakhuja
Increasing Maritime Competition: IORA, IONS, Milan and the Indian Ocean Networks
China in the Indian Ocean: Deep Sea Forays
Iran Navy: Developing Long Sea Legs

Middle Kingdom

DS Rajan
China in the Indian Ocean: Competing Priorities
China-Japan Friction: How can India Respond?
Nuke Street

Amb Sheelkant Sharma
Nuclear Security Summit 2014 and the NTI Index
Nuclear Power: An Annual Report Card

Red Affairs

Bibhu Prasad
Maoists in the Northeast: Reality and Myth-Making
Surrender of Gudsa Usendi: Ominous beginning for the Naxals?
South Asian Dialectic

PR Chari
Federalism: Centre as Coordinator and Adjudicator
Limits of Federalism

Spotlight West Asia

Amb Ranjit Gupta
Saudi Arabia-US Estrangement: Implications for the Indian Subcontinent
Syria Today: Is Regime Change the Answer?
The Arab World: Trying Times Ahead
Strategic Space

Manpreet Sethi
US, China and the South Asian Nuclear Construct
Responding to Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: A Strategy for India

The Strategist

Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Strategic Non-Nuclear Weapons: An Essential Consort to a Doctrine of No First Use
 

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
India-Japan Strategic Partnership: An Agenda

Beyond Partnership: Outlook for Indo-US Relations

Review of 2008 US Elections: Winners and Losers

Assessing Indo-US Relations During the Bush Years

Foreign Policy Orientations of Obama and McCain: Implications for India

Washington and North Korean Impasse: Is there a Way Out?

In Pursuit of Workable CBMs: Dateline Kashmir

Bush's Second Term and Future Directions of Indo-US Relations

Beyond the Korean Kimchi: India-South Korean Relations

India and Mauritius: Maritime Cooperation on the Upswing

CBMs in South Asia and Northeast Asia: The Sum of Two Parts

Emerging Patterns of India-Singapore Relations

India and Japan: Emerging Engagement

US, India and the Prospects for an ‘Asian NATO’

US-India Relations: New Dimensions

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2014
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September
 2013  2012  2011  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006
 2005  2004  2003  2002  2001  2000  1999  1998
 1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2014, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com