Home Contact Us
Search :
IPCS: Research Institutes in India
   

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Post Comment
#1540, 23 October 2004

East Asia Diary: Of a Grasshopper Challenging a Cock and Other Matters

Jabin T Jacob
National Chengchi University, Taipei

September 2004 saw Jiang Zemin taking what is apparently his last bow on the stage of Chinese politics. September will, however, also be remembered for Taiwanese Premier Yu Shyi-kun's "balance of terror" talk threatening attack on Shanghai and the Three Gorges Dam in China if Taiwan were attacked. Yu was also trying to justify a controversial 15-year arms purchase plan from the US costing Taiwan over US$18 billion. While the opposition Guomindang (KMT) chairman cited a Taiwanese saying when comparing Yu's threats of mutual destruction to a "grasshopper challenging a cock", in China itself, Hu Jintao took the bait using his first speech at the meeting of China's new CMC to tell the PLA to prepare "for a military struggle".

However, going by the happenings in the region this month the Chinese cock appears to have more than one challenger and more than a few headaches.

The revelations in early September, that South Korean scientists had conducted secret nuclear tests in the early 1980s and in 2000 followed by the North Korean declaration later in the month that it had weaponized the fuel from 8,000 reprocessed spent fuel rods, have queered the pitch considerably in the Northeast Asian strategic environment.

One, the hypocrisy of the US when dealing with issues nuclear has been exposed. Whereas it went to war against Iraq on the flimsiest of WMD evidence, continues to excoriate the Iranians and takes a non-compromising attitude toward the North Koreans, its official response to the South Korean affair has been almost casual and dismissive.

Two, the official Japanese response has also been muted, despite indications that it has urged the US itself to act strongly. This is because of two reasons. First, the Japanese need to keep the focus on North Korea whose actions it uses in part, to justify its "normalization" drive toward a more active role in international affairs - politically as well as militarily. Second, acknowledging South Korean nuclear capability would leave Japan with a question of 'face' or 'prestige' in a region where it has a history of being a dominant power. Third, like the issue of troop dispatch to Iraq and the subsequent kidnapping of its civilians that divided public opinion in Japan over its role and status in world affairs, the Korean exposes too will only sharpen the domestic debate over its own recessed option position.

Three, the South Korean revelations clearly show the limits to which countries like it or Japan may be willing to rely on the US's protective umbrella. The South Korean nuclear programme has roots that go back to the early 1970s, when the military dictator, Park Chung-Hee, gave it the go-ahead following American defeat in Vietnam and Washington's rapprochement with China. It was only after a US pledge to stop troop withdrawals from South Korea that the programme was stopped in 1975. But given the equally strong opposition within South Korea to any strong handed tactics towards North Korea, it remains a bit of a puzzle why the South Koreans would want to develop a nuclear option. The explanation might in part have to do with the fact that democratic South Korea still has a deeply conservative military, strongly suspicious of the intentions of its neighbours. Leaving aside North Korea, there are outstanding disputes with Japan over the Dokdo islands as well as with the Chinese over historical claims to the ancient kingdom, Koguryo, that ruled over much of present-day North Korea and Manchuria. Both disputes had surfaced again over the last several months.

Four, for China the turn of events clearly threw a spanner in the works as far as organizing the six-party talks went. Apart from saying that it was "concerned" over the news from South Korea, China's reaction too, was rather low-key reflecting perhaps its primary aims - in the immediate term, of preventing the Japanese from using North Korea as justification for a "normal" military role; and over the longer term of preventing a collapse of North Korea that would lead to a takeover by the South and by implication American presence on Chinese borders.

Paradoxically, each of the major players in the region - the US, China and Japan - have different reasons for muted responses to the South Korean affair. In the process, what is being brushed under the carpet is that after several years of pillorying India and Pakistan for going nuclear, Northeast Asia, under the 'supervision' of two of the strongest votaries for currently existing nuclear regimes is probably becoming a bigger nuclear headache for the world.

And finally, let no one underestimate what the Taiwanese "grasshopper" is capable of.

Rate this Article

Not Rated stars Ave. rating: Not Rated from 0 votes.
View comment(0)
POST Your Comment
No comment for this article
 
 
Article by same Author
Sino-Pak Nuclear Deal: American Perfidy?
Another Sino-Japanese Spat: So What’s New?
Sino-Indian Boundary Dispute: Present Imperfect and Future Tense?
9th Shangri-La Dialogue: Straight Talk, Bluster and Skepticism in Asia’s Choppy Waters
China’s Xinjiang Woes: Internal and External Implications
Sino-Indian Anti-Terror Cooperation: Contradictions Aplenty
China's Pakistan Quandary
A Chinese Puzzle in Vienna
China's Olympic Hurdles: The Three 'Evils'
The Congress (I)'s China Connection
Leadership Change in China and Implications for India
China and the Indo-US Nuclear Deal
India-Taiwan Relations: In Delicate Minuet
Arunachal in the Sino-Indian Dispute: Beyond the Visa Fracas
India and Japan - Towards Permanent Interests
India Missing: The China-Myanmar-Bangladesh Triangle
Assam: Back to Square One
North Korea Goes Nuclear: Fallout Extends Far and Wide
Hu Jintao's US Visit: Can't Hurry Cooperation
India-Japan-US Security Cooperation
India in East Asia: More Than Just Economics
The Meaning of Koizumi's Victory
China and the Indo-US Entente
China has America over a Barrel
Beijing Courts Taiwanese Opposition
East Asia Diary - April 2005: Reading the Past in the Present Tense
East Asia Diary - March 2005: History Still a Bugbear in South Korea-Japan Ties
China's Anti-Secession Law: The View from Taiwan
East Asia Diary - February 2005: Japan's Taiwan Gambit -
From 'Look East' to 'Think East'
East Asia Diary - December 2004: The 'East Asia Community' - Promise Aplenty
East Asia Diary - November 2004: The US Presidential Elections and the East Asian Response
East Asia Diary - October 2004: Japan's
Hu Jintao's New Uniform: What's the Message for Taiwan?
The Great Taiwanese Vote Trick
Pakistan's MNNA Status: Implications for China
Ruckus over Referendum III: Chinese Reactions
Ruckus over Referendum II: American Dilemma
Ruckus over Referendum I: Taiwanese Moves
Sino-Indian Naval Exercises: Chinese Perceptions
Vajpayee’s Syria Visit: Of Stronger Ties and Missed Opportunities
China and Taiwan Spar in Cyberspace
Suicide Bombers: A New Front Opens in Iraq
The Iranian Nuclear Weapons Issue: A Non-Zero-Sum Game
Female Suicide Bombers: A Political Perspective

 
ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2012, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.