Home Contact Us
Search :
   

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email FacebookFacebook
#3556, 16 January 2012
 
China's Modernization Rush: Kashgar At Crossroads
Bhavna Singh
Research Officer, CRP, IPCS
email: bhavna@ipcs.org
 

Kashgar acts as a pivot for Central Asian traders by hosting the biggest outdoor market in the world today. Every Sunday over 1, 50,000 traders from the Central Asian countries visit the market to exchange commodities with their Chinese counterparts. After being declared a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in 2009 and the efforts made by the Chinese government of late, it is likely to evolve into a metropolitan hub with a thriving economy. In this context, the article explores the following: impact of the Central government led economic integration of Kashgar, how the residents are likely to cope with measures of the central government despite reservations and the growth of the city as a regional commercial hub.

Government Initiatives

In 2009, the Chinese government doled out a plan for development of ‘industrial enclaves’ in Kashgar which were to emulate the Shenzhen model. Through this, the government claimed to initiate leap-frog development by adhering to its basic ideas of “planning first, implement step by step, pay attention to the people’s livelihood and comprehensive development.” Consequently, the Shenzhen and Hong Kong enterprises signed an agreement worth US$ 3.706 billion for investments with Kashgar in 2011 and donated almost US$ 15 million with the twin-aim of helping local enterprises to expand and provide an additional employment to 30, 000 people.

Recently, the central government has decided to provide financial subsidies to the Kashgar SEZ from 2011 to 2015, exempt qualified enterprises from business income-tax, subsidize fixed-asset investment and offer government loans to qualified companies at discounted rates. The government also intends to give discounts to qualified farm product-processing enterprises and other labour intensive companies by reducing their power consumption and transportation fees. The investments in major infrastructure-facilities construction projects in the two zones, including the construction of the China-Kyrghyzstan-Uzbekistan railway and the China-Pakistan railway have increased. This is keeping in view the need for connectivity with its neighbouring states to allow better economic exchange.

The revival of this historically significant town also feeds into the efforts by Chinese central government to correct the economic imbalance created by its preferential policies in Xinjiang. Its role in maintaining Central Asian and South Asian stability or enhancing what China perceives to be its Eurasian strategy. Being the western most railway station in China, Kashgar connects the Central Asian region to the rest of China through the 488-km Kashgar-Hotan Railway, which was opened for freight traffic in December 2010 and for passenger traffic in June 2011.

There is a strong indication of this SEZ being extended to include several regions from Pakistan. This was indicated during Senator Talha Mehmood’s (the Chairman of Senate Standing Committee for the Interior of Pakistan) visit to Xinjiang to mark the 60th anniversary of diplomatic ties between China and Pakistan in November 2011.  Feasibility studies on a railway line linking Kashgar and Pok are also under consideration as per the Joint Venture signed by China and Pakistan in November 2009. However, it is significant also to reflect on the flipside of these developments.

Asymmetrical Developments and Consequences

Asymmetrical economic development has led to strong resentment amongst the Uyghurs who form almost 50 per cent of Kashgar’s population. While most of the earlier trade products included Chinese silk, porcelain, spices, raisins, grapes, figs and almonds that were available locally, the Central government initiatives have led to change in the nature of products being traded presently. The traditional occupations are no longer as profitable as they used to be and the ethnic groups practicing other vocations have also had to relocate. New commercial opportunities have led to huge amount of migration into the city leading to widespread social tension. The manifestation of a ‘Western Shenzhen’ at a rapid pace has left many of the local inhabitants fuming over the nature of displacement and holding the state accountable for the destruction of their traditional culture. As the wealth shifts from one ethnic group to another and the traditional land to newly allotted holders, the social fabric of the region is under severe pressure.

The Road Ahead

While these developments will further the process of economic integration of the region, they also pose a significant challenge to the state by strengthening the linkages with the Muslim fundamentalist groups in the neighbouring countries. The residents of Kashgar are yet again faced with the dilemma of choosing between economic prosperity and preservation of their traditions. Conventionally, any society undergoing rapid economic development often faces deeper bifurcation given the accrual of wealth amongst some groups at the cost of others. Considering this, the argument amongst the locals on non-cooperation with the state needs to be taken with some caution.

However, as far as cultural deterioration is concerned the Chinese government needs to take the aspirations of the indigenous ethnic group into consideration. While the urban push might lead to loss of traditional occupations and means of livelihood, it also has the capacity to generate alternate means of survival which need to be adopted by these locals. The local communities need to utilize the opportunities provided by the revival, which is a much needed perspective to minimize the contravention between locals and the Government. 

 
Article by same Author
China in the US Presidential Debate: The Return of Protectionism?

China and the Arctic: The Next ‘Strategic’ Frontline?

Tibet and the Pursuit of Happiness

Self-Immolations in Tibet-III: Altruism, Fatalism or Anomie?

China’s London Dreams: ‘The Beats of China, Move the World’

Self-Immolations in Tibet-II: The ‘Neutral Stance’ on a Political Instrument

China’s Political Transition 2012: Seize, Snap or Smoothen?

China: The Red Weddings

Self-immolations in Tibet-I: Wider Implications

Will China have an Anna Hazare?

Xinjiang’s July Syndrome: Terrorism or Misgovernance?

China’s Nepal Focus

Kung Fu Panda: American Invasion of Chinese Culture?

Pre-election Flare-ups for the Tibetan Community: Allegations and Rebuttal

Sino-Tajik Border: Settlement or Entrapment?

Myanmar Elections 2010 – IV: China and the Charade

East China Sea Disputes: Will Economic Cooperation Alone Suffice?

Turkistan Islamic Party: Chasing a Relinquished Dream?

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
FacebookFacebook
 
Print Bookmark Email
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map | IPCS Email
B 7/3 Lower Ground Floor, Safdarjung Enclave, New Delhi 110029, INDIA.
Tel: 91-11-4100 1900, 4165 2556, 4165 2557, 4165 2558, 4165 2559 Fax: (91-11) 41652560
Email:
© Copyright 2013, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.
        Web Design by http://www.indiainternets.com