Home Contact Us  
   

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4751, 20 November 2014
 
China in Afghanistan: Is the Engagement Really a Win-Win?
Rajeshwari Krishnamurthy
Research Officer, IReS, IPCS
Email: rajeshwari@ipcs.org
 

On 28 October, Ashraf Ghani, the newly-elected president of Afghanistan, landed in Beijing, making China the destination of his first international visit after assuming office. The timing and the visit are telling. The West has been attempting to convince China to take the lead following the completion of the troop withdrawal. Given how China’s engagement with Afghanistan has not been extraordinary over the past ten years, what does an intensified Kabul-Beijing bilateral mean for both parties?

China’s Engagement with Afghanistan: An Assessment
From 2001-2014, the China-Afghanistan bilateral remained rather lacklustre. Beijing has so far only contributed a measly US$250 million in aid to the country. In fact, Chinese involvement in the reconstruction of the country was minimal until 2011. However, given the sizes of the economies and overlapping geopolitical, internal political and economic plans, among others, China today is an important partner for Afghanistan.
 
A Win-Win?
The upswing in this bilateral is indeed timely. The recent boost in the Beijing-Kabul bilateral has oft been backed by a win-win narrative, listing three areas as mutual interests. However, will this camaraderie bring about substantial returns for both parties?

Energy: China is a growing economy that is constantly energy-hungry. Despite its forays into Africa, securing energy security in the neighbourhood is also extremely important. Afghanistan is abundant in natural resources such as oil, natural gas, copper, iron ore, and other rare earths. Furthermore, it is in the process of rejuvenating its economy to ensure stability and self-sustenance post the Western troop withdrawal and reduction in foreign aid. A finger in the Afghan energy pie is important for Beijing that, while expanding its energy sources, is simultaneously diversifying them. It already has a stake in Kazakhstan’s Kashagan oil field, and the functional and expanding Central Asia-China natural gas pipeline that passes through Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan.

However, foreign investment in the Afghan energy sector is difficult due to security threats. For his part, Ghani is undertaking what he sees as in the best interest of his country. The new government must not be swayed by the positive turn of events and stay focused on the country’s best interests. Abundance in resources also brings with it the likelihood of a resource curse that has already emerged with the possibility of the destruction of the Mes Aynak archaeological site. Given how Ghani plans to make energy the bulwark of the Afghan economy, he would do well to learn from the African experience of engaging with China, and deploy knowledge from successful resource-rich countries in Europe and Latin America to put in place effective mechanisms to ensure transparency and the avoidance of a resource curse situation.
 
Security: China’s security concerns vis-à-vis Afghanistan is almost always viewed from the Xinjiang lens. China’s Xinjiang Province shares a small, rugged border with Afghanistan’s Badakshan Province. The bordering Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region has seen much unrest, and insurgency by Islamist groups such as the East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) who have links with other Islamist groups in the region have worried China for a long time. However, the border between Afghanistan and China is rather short, and any cooperation between the two would not deliver any substantial difference in dealing with the ETIM cadres. In fact, China would do well to further engage Pakistan to make a difference. However, that Beijing is also looking at Kabul could mean that it has lost its confidence and/or trust in Islamabad’s contribution to dealing with the ETIM extremists, who are often sheltered and trained by Pakistan-based jihadist outfits. Alternately, China could simply be using the Xinjiang narrative to portray to the world that it is genuinely interested in contributing to ensure security and stability in Afghanistan, while using this as a tool to complete its image of having an ‘all round interest in Afghanistan’.

Trade: Afghanistan has been projected as a key component of China’s New Silk Route initiative via which Beijing plans to revive the historical Silk Route - a trade route that connected China, West Asia and Europe. This fits perfectly in Ghani’s strategy to revive the country’s economy, make it a “hub of regional trade, transit and peace,” and reduce reliance on aid. However, Afghanistan does not feature in the New Silk Route map that has been made public. The New Silk Route in fact bypasses Afghanistan and enters Iran by through Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan and Turkmenistan.

Unless China is in the process of drawing a new access route into Iran’s Chabahar port via Afghanistan, the New Silk Route will not bring great returns for Afghanistan. A new route plan is plausible, given how Beijing has expressed its interest in developing the Port, thereby providing it with an option other than Pakistan’s Gwadar Port to access other West Asian countries, and Africa.

In either case, the likelihood of Afghanistan becoming a transit hub - an upshot of the dividends that can be reaped by being on the New Silk Route Corridor - is higher than that of it becoming a trade hub. Regardless, Ghani must ensure that the country’s manufacturing sector gets a boost and that the Afghan market is not inundated with Chinese goods.

Ghani’s Task: Trust but Verify 
China has played its cards deftly and has effortlessly come out looking like the knight in shining armour, despite making paltry contributions over ten years. This is essentially a manifestation of Deng Xiaoping’s policy of ‘keep a low profile and bide your time’ in incumbent Chinese President Xi Jinping’s leadership strategies. 
 
For China, engaging with Afghanistan is more about pragmatism and furthering its own agenda than genuine concern for the country or the region. That this move does promise returns for Afghanistan as well as the region is simply a fortunate happenstance that China can use to further its image as a responsible regional and global player.

In the euphoria of potential stability, Kabul must not forget the principle of ‘trust but verify’.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 
Related Articles
Teshu Singh,
"China’s Endgame in Afghanistan," 24 November 2014
Mariam Safi,
"Af-Pak: A Fresh Start," 18 November 2014

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
India-Afghanistan Relations: Innovating Continuity

Afghanistan and the Attempted Exhumation of the QCG

FSI Afghanistan: Limited Scope for Use

Brass Tacks of the Emerging Afghan Taliban

Forecast 2016: Afghanistan

Countering Extremist Propaganda: A Strategy for India

India-Afghanistan: Interesting Times Ahead

Afghanistan: Takeaways from the Kunduz Offensive

What is the Afghan Taliban Up To?

What�s Brewing between Afghanistan and Pakistan?

What�s on Pakistan-based Militants� Minds?

Islamic State in Af-Pak: The �Wilayat Khurasan� Conundrum

IPCS Forecast: Islamic State in 2015

China and the Uyghur Issue: Can the New Silk Route Really Help?

Islamic State and Foreign Fighters: Jihadists from Central Asia

Tactical Nuclear Weapons: Implications of Pakistan's Nuclear Developments

Afghanistan: The New President and a Joint Venture Government

Al Qaeda in South Asia: The Terror World Championship Begins

Islamic State and South Asia: How Real is the Threat?

The Islamic ‘Caliphate’ and Sectarian Violence: Ramifications for Pakistan

Sri Lanka and Myanmar: Understanding the Rise of Buddhist Radicalism

Pakistan: Potential Blowbacks of Operation Zarb-e-Azb

A New Foreign Policy Agenda for Modi: ‘Look West’

Afghan Presidential Run-off: Things that Matter

Media in Pakistan: Divided They Fall

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November  December
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.