Home Contact Us  

China - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#4719, 31 October 2014
China and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: A New Regional Order?
Teshu Singh
Senior Research Officer, CRP, IPCS
Email: teshu@ipcs.org

The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB) was recently launched in Beijing and will be operational by 2015. China’s proactive role in the matter has alarmed other world powers, begging the question: what are China’s objectives and does the bank mark the beginning of a new regional order?

The AIIB is an initiative by the new Chinese leadership that seeks a more equal and balanced development model in Asia. The total capital of the bank is USD 100 billion, the initial capital will be 50 billion, and the paid in ratio will be 20 per cent. China being the second largest economy falls in the ‘Category II’ voting bloc at the World Bank, while at the Asian Development Bank it has a 5.5 per cent share. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) is always headed by Japan. China, along with other countries, therefore seeks to change the representation at these institutions.

Twenty-one countries along with China have joined the AIIB; India has joined because it wants better representation in an international economic institution. Thailand joined the bank because it was looking for an alternative means to fund its transport system. Some countries, like Australia, South Korea and Indonesia were not present at the inauguration. It thus shows that the members have joined the bank willingly and have not been co-opted by the Chinese. Although the structural modalities of the bank have not yet been spelled out, this is not the first time that a regional bank is being established. The Europe Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) has been functioning since 1991, when the Soviet Union dissolved.

Recently, there have been questions about China ‘peaceful development’. In terms of a foreign policy agenda, the AIIB is a step towards projecting China as responsible regional player and subsequently a global power. It the Chinese alternative to the Trans Pacific Partnership (TPP) led by the US and Japan and an answer to the US ‘pivot to Asia’. It is an endeavour by China to discourage Asian countries to seek help from the US or US-led institutions, thereby restricting its entry into Asia. The bank will also highlight China’s significant experience in infrastructure financing, and indeed, multilateral development banking in general. Also, the APEC summit is scheduled for November 2014, and China might have wanted to launch the bank prior to it so that a formal announcement could be made at the summit in the presence of the US.

The Chinese economy is set to reach USD 10 trillion this year with a trade surplus of three trillion, and it wants to invest the money in a way that will increase its international status. This bank will be vital in tapping China’s excess savings and utilising them for developing Asia. As a result, it will help China legalise the RMB and reduce its own direct lending. This will create opportunities for Chinese companies to get contracts for projects. The ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) is also scheduled to start functioning by the end of 2015 - China thus wants to start the bank before the AEC becomes functional so that it can involve ASEAN countries in the projects. Consequently, the bank will add value to China’s relations with its neighbours by deepening trade ties.

A New Regional Order?
Asian countries are growing at a fast pace; by 2030 they will account for almost half of the global GDP. According to a report by the ADB, in the next decade, Asian countries will need USD8 trillion in infrastructure investments to maintain the current economic growth rate. Existing institutions like the ADB neither have the capital nor the expertise to cater to infrastructural needs. On the contrary, China has the money and the experience from its remarkable infrastructure development path. Drawing from China’s experience, the bank will help in providing the required infrastructure for the ‘Asian Century’.

It will give credit for investments in real economy unlike the ‘Washington Consensus’; the first proposed project of the bank is the New Silk Road and the Maritime Silk Road (MSR). Both the projects are oriented towards infrastructure development and connectivity in the region. Again, these projects will not only benefit China but the countries along which they are located and certainly, the region as a whole.

Asian economies are expanding and are expected to become more complex and interconnected. Such initiatives will help to sustain the pace of their development. This marks the beginning of a new era led by China as the leader and not the US, and will help China enhance its claim as a regional leader as this is the first initiative to strengthen economic coordination within the Asian region.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within

OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee

Related Articles
Varun Sahni,
"When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India," 21 October 2014
Siwei Liu,
"“China Threat” in South Asia: A Perspective from China," 16 October 2014
Vijay Shankar,
"Strategic Estrangement: An Odd Bedfellow to Economic Engagement," 13 October 2014
Vijay Sakhuja,
"Xi Jinping and the Maritime Silk Road: The Indian Dilemma," 15 September 2014

Browse by Publications

Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Naxalite Violence 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
A 'New Era' of Democracy in Taiwan: Implications for Regional Security & Economy

IPCS Forecast: China in 2015

Securing India's Interests in the Indian Ocean: New Strategies and Approaches

China's End Game in Hong Kong

Contemporary Foreign Policy of China: Legacy of Deng Xiaoping

BRICS: China’s End-Game

US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue: Lessons for India

The Malabar Exercises: India, Japan and the US

China 2013: New Leadership

China and Air Defence Identification Zone (ADIZ): Political Objectives and International Responses

The Positives

China and Southeast Asia: What is the Strategy behind the Maritime Silk Road?

China and Myanmar: The Great Game of the Gas Pipeline

China and the US: Fifth Strategic and Economic Dialogue

Xi-Obama Summit

Quest for Energy Security

India and China: What did the Salman Khurshid and Li Keqiang Visits Achieve?

China: Engaging Nepal as a Land Port

China: Contextualising the Anti-Access Area-Denial Strategy

China and the Asia-Pacific: Trends, Challenges and Dilemmas

Second Sino- Indian Strategic Economic Dialogue: A SWOT Analysis

China: Reasons for being a Top FDI Destination

IPCS Discussion: Sino-Indian and Sino-South Korean Relations

IPCS Discussion: China's Role in North Korea's Stability and Regional Security

Yang Yechi in Southeast Asia: A fruitful Visit?

Y! MyWeb
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2018
 January  February
 2017  2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010
 2009  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002
 2001  2000  1999  1998  1997

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2018, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.