Home Contact Us  
   

Afghanistan - Articles

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
#2426, 27 November 2007
 
NATO Breakdown in Afghanistan
Mariam Safi
Research Intern, IPCS
e-mail: mariam@ipcs.org
 

NATO's Secretary-General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, officially dismissed all accusations of NATO's mission in Afghanistan being a failure. However, there are numerous questions probing the effectiveness of NATO in Afghanistan. With 50,000 foreign troops on the ground why have the Taliban been successful in infiltrating the northwestern and northeastern parts of Afghanistan? If NATO is effective, why have insurgency-related attacks increased from 27 in 2005 to 139 attacks in 2007 resulting in the killing of 1,200 civilians?

Apparently, NATO is retreating from the fact that 2006 witnessed the worst civilian and military casualties since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001. In a meeting of NATO defence ministers in Noordwijk, Hoop insisted that NATO was making good progress. Despite, NATO's self-congratulation, in reality, the Taliban have successfully extended their operations beyond southern Afghanistan and into the northeastern and western provinces of Baghlan and Farah respectively. In the first week of November 2007, the Taliban successfully captured three districts in Farah. Relying heavily on suicide tactics and road side bombs the Taliban were able to maneuver into Farah which borders Iran first, capturing the district of Gulistan, then Bakwa and lastly Khak-e-Saif. In the south, the Taliban recaptured a third of the district of Arghandab in Kandahar province. Canadian forces told the Canadian newspaper, Toronto Star, that the attacks on Argandab were one of the most organized Taliban offensives they had seen. This has left NATO uncertain of its military strategy and President Hamid Karzai pleading for more troops on the ground.

Seven years after the removal of the Taliban, today a revitalized Taliban insurgency has reemerged. In an effort to oust the Afghan government and NATO forces, the Taliban have in the last two years, with some assistance from Pakistan restructured themselves. Public distrust and agnosticism is growing against the government and foreign troops as civilian casualties rise. From 2005 to 2006, armed attacks by the Taliban, tripled from 1,558 to 4,542 and roadside bombs doubled from 783 to 1,677. Regardless of government and NATO security efforts, 2007 witnessed a 20 per cent increase in insurgency-related violence.

Northern Afghanistan has always been regarded as relatively secure compared to the south and east where suicide attacks are daily occurrences. Taliban insurgency is spreading there as well as reflected on 7 November 2007, in Baghlan; suicide attack killed approximately seventy seven people including six parliamentarians and dozens of school children visiting a sugar factory. Musa Qalan was a district that fell to the Taliban in February after British troops transferred security responsibilities to a weak and unready Afghan police force.

In light of swelling tensions over civilian casualties caused by foreign troops, the British House of Commons Defense Committee published a report that stressed the need for more reconstruction and development initiatives rather than military power to sustain the peace-building process. Titled "UK operations in Afghanistan," the report included key recommendations regarding US support, the appointment of a high-profiled "authoritative individual" to coordinate the activities of the 37-nation coalition, minimizing civilian casualties, deployment of more troops by committed NATO members, more emphasis on training the Afghan National Police Force, and eradication of the narcotics economy and providing alternative livelihoods for farmers. The US and UK must establish communication with Iran and Pakistan as a means to foster regional cooperation and mend efforts to combat the Taliban. In July, 2006, Britain's commander of international forces in Afghanistan warned that the war in Afghanistan was winnable but at the pace it was proceeding, NATO needed to realize that they could actually fail. A year later, referencing the Defence Committee Report, Paddy Ashdown, a former High Representative for Bosnia and Herzegovina, asserted that the international community had indeed failed to sustain peace and security in Afghanistan.

The dominant military burden in Afghanistan rests on NATO capabilities, but the response has been disappointing. In reality, the lack of commitment, responsibility and resources of NATO members have led to a rise in insecurity and a decline in political and economic reconstruction. Based on the above facts, it may be concluded, that Hoop's assertion on NATO's "progress" in Afghanistan is misleading.

Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
IPCS Columnists
Af-Pak Diary
D Suba Chandran
Resetting Kabul-Islamabad Relations: Three Key Issues
Can Pakistan Reset its Relations with Afghanistan?
The New Afghanistan: Four Major Challenges for President Ghani
Big Picture
Prof Varun Sahni
Understanding Democracy and Diversity in J&K
When Xi Met Modi: Juxtaposing China and India
Pakistan?s Tactical Nuclear Weapons: The Inevitability of Instability

Dateline Colombo

Asanga Abeyagoonasekera.
Sri Lanka: Moving Towards a Higher Collective Outcome
The Importance of Electing the Best to our Nation's Parliament
Sri Lanka: Toward a Diaspora Re-Engagement Plan
Dateline Islamabad
Salma Malik
Pakistan's Hurt Locker: What Next?
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
India-Pakistan Relations in 2015: Through a Looking Glass
 
Dhaka Discourse
Prof Delwar Hossain
IPCS Forecast: Bangladesh in 2015
18th SAARC Summit: A Perspective from Bangladesh
Bangladesh in Global Forums: Diplomacy vs. Domestic Politics
Eagle Eye
Prof Chintamani Mahapatra
India-US: Significance of the Second Modi-Obama Meet
Has President Obama Turned Lame Duck?
Modi-Obama Summit: Criticism for Criticism?s Sake?

East Asia Compass
Dr Sandip Mishra
India-Japan-US Trilateral: India?s Policy for the Indo-Pacific
China-South Korea Ties: Implications for the US Pivot to Asia
Many ?Pivots to Asia?: What Does It Mean For Regional Stability?
Himalayan Frontier
Pramod Jaiswal
Nepal?s New Constitution: Instrument towards Peace or Catalyst to Conflict?
IPCS Forecast: Nepal in 2015
Constitution-making: Will Nepal Miss its Second Deadline?

Indo-Pacific
Prof Shankari Sundararaman
IPCS Forecast: Southeast Asia in 2015
Indonesia's Pacific Identity: What Jakarta Must Do in West Papua
Modi in Myanmar: From ?Look East? to ?Act East?
Indus-tan
Sushant Sareen
IPCS Forecast: Pakistan in 2015
Islamic State: Prospects in Pakistan
Pakistan: The Futility of Internationalising Kashmir

Looking East
Wasbir Hussain
Myanmar in New Delhi's Naga Riddle
China: ?Peaceful? Display of Military Might
Naga Peace Accord: Need to Reserve Euphoria
Maritime Matters
Vijay Sakhuja
Indian Ocean: Modi on a Maritime Pilgrimage
Indian Ocean: Exploring Maritime Domain Awareness
IPCS Forecast: The Indian Ocean in 2015

Nuke Street
Amb Sheelkant Sharma
US-Russia and Global Nuclear Security: Under a Frosty Spell?
India's Nuclear Capable Cruise Missile: The Nirbhay Test
India-Australia Nuclear Agreement: Bespeaking of a New Age
Red Affairs
Bibhu Prasad
Countering Left Wing Extremism: Failures within Successes
Return of the Native: CPI-Maoist in Kerala
The Rising Civilian Costs of the State-Vs-Extremists Conflict

Regional Economy
Amita Batra
India and the APEC
IPCS Forecast: South Asian Regional Integration
South Asia: Rupee Regionalisation and Intra-regional Trade Enhancement
South Asian Dialectic
PR Chari
Resuming the Indo-Pak Dialogue: Evolving a New Focus
Defence Management in India: An Agenda for Parrikar
Pakistani Taliban and Al Qaeda in Afghanistan: Implications for Asian Security

Spotlight West Asia
Amb Ranjit Gupta
Prime Minister Modi Finally Begins His Interaction with West Asia*
A Potential Indian Role in West Asia?
US-GCC Summit: More Hype than Substance
Strategic Space
Manpreet Sethi
India-Russia Nuclear Vision Statement: See that it Delivers
Global Nuclear Disarmament: The Humanitarian Consequences Route
Nasr: Dangers of Pakistan's Short Range Ballistic Missile

The Strategist
Vice Admiral Vijay Shankar
Jihadi Aggression and Nuclear Deterrence
The Blight of Ambiguity
Falun Gong: The Fear Within


OTHER REGULAR contributors
Gurmeet Kanwal
Harun ur Rashid
N Manoharan
Wasbir Hussain
Rana Banerji
N Manoharan

Ruhee Neog
Teshu Singh
Aparupa Bhattacherjee
Roomana Hukil
Aparupa Bhattacherjee


 

Browse by Publications

Commentaries 
Issue Briefs 
Special Reports 
Research Papers 
Seminar Reports 
Conference Reports 

Browse by Region/Countries

East Asia 
South Asia 
Southeast Asia 
US & South Asia 
China 
Myanmar 
Afghanistan 
Iran 
Pakistan 
India 
J&K  

Browse by Issues

India & the world  
Indo-Pak 
Military 
Terrorism 
Naxalite Violence 
Nuclear 
Suicide Terrorism 
Peace & Conflict Database 
Article by same Author
Af-Pak: A Fresh Start

Can Afghanistan Become a "Perfect Place?"

Afghanistan: Political Crises After the Presidential Run-off

Talibanís Spring Offensive: Are the ANSF Prepared?

Presidential Elections 2014: Afghan-Owned, Afghan-Led

Afghan Elections 2014: What to Expect?

Afghanistan, US and the Peace Process: A Deal with the Taliban in 2014?

Bonn II: From Transition to Transformation in Afghanistan

ADD TO:
Blink
Del.icio.us
Digg
Furl
Google
Simpy
Spurl
Y! MyWeb
Facebook
 
Print Bookmark Email Facebook Subscribe
Year 2017
 January  February  March  April  May  June  July  August  September  October  November  December
 2016  2015  2014  2013  2012  2011  2010  2009
 2008  2007  2006  2005  2004  2003  2002  2001
 2000  1999  1998  1997
 
 

The Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies (IPCS) is the premier South Asian think tank which conducts independent research on and provides an in depth analysis of conventional and non-conventional issues related to national and South Asian security including nuclear issues, disarmament, non-proliferation, weapons of mass destruction, the war on terrorism, counter terrorism , strategies security sector reforms, and armed conflict and peace processes in the region.

For those in South Asia and elsewhere, the IPCS website provides a comprehensive analysis of the happenings within India with a special focus on Jammu and Kashmir and Naxalite Violence. Our research promotes greater understanding of India's foreign policy especially India-China relations, India's relations with SAARC countries and South East Asia.

Through close interaction with leading strategic thinkers, former members of the Indian Administrative Service, the Foreign Service and the three wings of the Armed Forces - the Indian Army, Indian Navy, and Indian Air Force, - the academic community as well as the media, the IPCS has contributed considerably to the strategic discourse in India.

 
Subscribe to Newswire | Site Map
18, Link Road, Jungpura Extension, New Delhi 110014, INDIA.

Tel: 91-11-4100-1902    Email: officemail@ipcs.org

© Copyright 2017, Institute of Peace and Conflict Studies.